Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(121,473 posts)
4. If the judge had been considered as an individual I wouldn't have agreed with granting him clemency.
Tue Dec 17, 2024, 05:24 PM
Dec 17

But he wasn't considered as an individual; he was just included in a batch of 1,500 people who met the advisory committee's criteria (they were already on home detention due to covid; crimes weren't violent or drug-related, not likely to re-offend, etc.). But the article seems to be implying that Biden knowingly granted clemency to a particular person who doesn't deserve it, much to the understandable dismay of the judge's victims - but that's not what happened at all. Arguably, blanket pardons and/or clemency aren't such a great idea because some undeserving person could benefit, but that's what this was, like it or not. Did Democracy Not expect Biden to review each of the 1,500 people on the list, or did they just go looking for another excuse to crap on another Democrat?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cable News Clips»"It Broke Him": Mother Wh...»Reply #4