Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jimmy the one

(2,718 posts)
5. voted down is correct, by my reasoning
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 12:06 PM
Nov 2014

ggjohn: Republicans didn't have the Senate in 2013, they had the House, but the Senate was controlled by the Dems

Telling people things they're well aware of doesn't enhance your persona here.
I think you purposely read too much into what I said; I put it well enough, that the 'republican senate', being the republicans in the senate, voted down the bg check bill. The only way I know of to vote down something (defeat) in senate, when you have a minority, is to filibuster with at least 41 senators.
Actually that works even if republicans had indeed controlled the senate with 51, then all they needed to vote it down was at least the filibuster 41, had sufficient repubs actually supported it (cough).

how I put it: Sick that the republican senate voted down bg checks in 2013...

They voted it down, by having a filibuster proof minority of at least 41 senators. There wasn't any other way to defeat bg check bill, other than to 'vote it down', as I put it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Washington voters approvi...»Reply #5