Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(148,161 posts)
2. As for your statement as to what the author of that article says,
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 11:43 AM
Mar 2019

you are incorrect there, too. You quoted the salient paragraph, and it does not say simply that the secular media TAKES that position. Instead it says that that position "is OFTEN SHARED in ignorance by the secular media." In leaving out those qualifying modifiers and changing the verb used in the article, you changed the statement you quoted in your very excerpt to suit your own biases.

Why try to change what the author has written by restating it incorrectly? You cannot make the author say what the author did not say, by reframing it, Why change the author's words? That you do it while quoting those very words is awkward for you, I think.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And yet, New York Magazine is part of that media. MineralMan Mar 2019 #1
I said: guillaumeb Mar 2019 #3
As for your statement as to what the author of that article says, MineralMan Mar 2019 #2
Another misreading. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #4
The highlighting is mine, of course, to point out the differences MineralMan Mar 2019 #5
Look at reply #3 guillaumeb Mar 2019 #8
All I need do is look at the OP. MineralMan Mar 2019 #11
Yes, it is. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #12
What the actual fuck? trotsky Mar 2019 #6
What I said: guillaumeb Mar 2019 #7
Another change in the intent of the original author. MineralMan Mar 2019 #9
Define commentary. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #10
No one's perfect Lordquinton Mar 2019 #13
That would make a good post. eom guillaumeb Mar 2019 #14
What bothers me is you highlighting it Lordquinton Mar 2019 #15
What I said: guillaumeb Mar 2019 #16
You seem to be at odds with the author Lordquinton Mar 2019 #17
No, I am disagreeing with the author's view that it is accidental. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #18
So the secular media is running a conspiracy against Christians? Lordquinton Mar 2019 #19
The conservative media is promoting a view. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Openly Gay, Openly Christ...»Reply #2