Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
2. "it is highly suspicious that the stone itself has never been found"
Sat May 11, 2013, 08:27 PM
May 2013

That kind of jumped out at me. Someone claims to have found an inscription on a stone, but there is no stone?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Columbus was not the first one... [View all] Anonymousecoview May 2013 OP
Damn Furriners! Politicalboi May 2013 #1
What is the GOP? Anonymousecoview May 2013 #6
"it is highly suspicious that the stone itself has never been found" arcane1 May 2013 #2
The stone was copied... Anonymousecoview May 2013 #4
And Joseph Smith claimed to copy golden plates that nobody else has seen arcane1 May 2013 #8
I hear you Anonymousecoview May 2013 #10
Hey don't leave out St. Brendan Warpy May 2013 #3
So true... Anonymousecoview May 2013 #5
I always found the Kennewick Man debate amusing. So they found this guy with supposedly brewens May 2013 #7
Good points... Anonymousecoview May 2013 #9
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»First Americans»Columbus was not the firs...»Reply #2