Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Anonymousecoview

(225 posts)
Sat May 11, 2013, 08:09 PM May 2013

Columbus was not the first one...

The Phoenician Paraiba Stone of Brazil proves that Columbus was not the first explorer over the Atlantic. Let's see, there was the Vikings, the Chinese, ancient India and now the Phoenicians. Come as see this stone fully translated for the first time and prove a visit from the ancient land of Canaan to the shores of America....

http://www.scribd.com/doc/140852220/Phoenicians-in-the-Americas

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Columbus was not the first one... (Original Post) Anonymousecoview May 2013 OP
Damn Furriners! Politicalboi May 2013 #1
What is the GOP? Anonymousecoview May 2013 #6
"it is highly suspicious that the stone itself has never been found" arcane1 May 2013 #2
The stone was copied... Anonymousecoview May 2013 #4
And Joseph Smith claimed to copy golden plates that nobody else has seen arcane1 May 2013 #8
I hear you Anonymousecoview May 2013 #10
Hey don't leave out St. Brendan Warpy May 2013 #3
So true... Anonymousecoview May 2013 #5
I always found the Kennewick Man debate amusing. So they found this guy with supposedly brewens May 2013 #7
Good points... Anonymousecoview May 2013 #9
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
2. "it is highly suspicious that the stone itself has never been found"
Sat May 11, 2013, 08:27 PM
May 2013

That kind of jumped out at me. Someone claims to have found an inscription on a stone, but there is no stone?

 

Anonymousecoview

(225 posts)
4. The stone was copied...
Sat May 11, 2013, 09:36 PM
May 2013

There is not an original copy of the Hebrew Bible either, but the copies are considered authentic. Read on - you'll find a reason why the land owner would have not wanted to step forward with the stone...

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
8. And Joseph Smith claimed to copy golden plates that nobody else has seen
Sun May 12, 2013, 11:04 AM
May 2013

Therefore the Book of Mormon is 100% authentic.

 

Anonymousecoview

(225 posts)
10. I hear you
Mon May 13, 2013, 09:41 AM
May 2013

The article above looks for authenticity in the Paraiba stone, not from its claim to be ancient Phoenician, but rather from a scientific breakdown of the writing itself in comparison to other ancient writings from the Middle East.

Warpy

(113,131 posts)
3. Hey don't leave out St. Brendan
Sat May 11, 2013, 09:31 PM
May 2013

whose drunken tall tales actually did contain a decent map of the Americas from Newfoundland down to Cape Cod. And he made it home to tell them.

Columbus was the first imperialist, though, claiming the land he found for a European monarch, to hell with the people who already lived there and thought it was theirs.

Monarchies were wealthy and organized enough to mount exploratory missions, military conquests, and large scale colonization as ships full of traders from seafaring cultures had not been.

Saying Columbus was the first has always been inaccurate. Saying he was the first imperialist takes care of that.

 

Anonymousecoview

(225 posts)
5. So true...
Sat May 11, 2013, 09:39 PM
May 2013

It's easy to be content with the atmosphere of willful ignorance about a 500 year history of imperial genocide against indigenous cultures. Yet, Indigenous World-view will restore the earth....

 

brewens

(15,359 posts)
7. I always found the Kennewick Man debate amusing. So they found this guy with supposedly
Sat May 11, 2013, 11:55 PM
May 2013

Scandinavian features. So what? That doesn't give European descendants any claim to having our people here earlier. Whatever he was, if he had any descendants, they would be the native people found here by early explorers.

I wouldn't say it was impossible for early tribes that migrated from Eurasia or wherever to have been somewhat mixed race in the first place. Why not? It might be a stretch to think an African could end up with people from Siberia coming over 10,000 years ago, but a few individuals from a more northern region with different characteristics might have happened.

 

Anonymousecoview

(225 posts)
9. Good points...
Mon May 13, 2013, 09:39 AM
May 2013

Your perspective leads us towards what the Blackfoot Elders have been telling us about their stories existing since as long as the rivers have run...

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»First Americans»Columbus was not the firs...