Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lamsmy

(155 posts)
2. Leave it out.
Fri Jul 6, 2018, 05:11 AM
Jul 2018

The view and use of firearms has changed dramatically over time and probably will continue to do so. The framers of the Constitution added the second amendment with very clear purpose relevant to the exact circumstances and concerns of the time.

Those underlying concerns are no longer relevant in today's world which leaves this historical remnant completely out of sync with a modern society's attempts at law enforcement and improving health and safety. Crime rates are lower in developped nations with strict gun laws. Police officers almost never shoot anyone, including criminals, largely because they are less likely to be shot themselves. Accidental deaths by firearms in Europe and Canada are a tiny fraction of the number they are in the US.

Having this amendment in a nation taught to revere the sanctity of their constitution forces Americans to either twist modern logic to suit a two hundred year old document or attack the document itself. It's a lose lose situation and an error that has cost countless lives.

On another note, the freedom OF religion bit should also have specifically included freedom FROM the religion of others.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Hypothetical/philosophica...»Reply #2