Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Gun Rights Poster Girl Shot In Back By 4 Year Old Son [View all]friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)37. Nah, a "MGAFYGAE" and "Uncle Ruckus", and possibly a "F*dd"
From a still-useful thread. The whole thing is worth a read, as it discusses some very familiar
ploys
How to recognize the tactics used by anti gun activists in their plan to ban guns
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x361725#367600
X_Digger
Response to Original message
60. How about..
Not sure if this one counts as a separate one, but the..
MGAFYGAE -- "MY guns are fine, YOUR guns are evil."
Black powder guns, revolvers, traditionally stocked shotguns, deer rifles, even 1911's- "But I {or Dad, or Granddad, or Uncle Duke} had / have one of those, so they're perfectly fine. The rest of your guns? Ban 'em."
friendly_iconoclast
Response to Reply #60
61. That's a good one. A variant is the "Uncle Ruckus"
Claiming to be a gun owner and/or very familiar with guns, and yet continually putting down other gun owners
jeepnstein
66. They're called "Fudds".
While I personally have nothing against Elmer Fudd and his War on Rabbits, his human counterparts are obnoxious at times.
They'll wax poetic about how this or that firearm is beyond reproach or ban because it has some sporting use. They constantly want to make the 2nd Amendment about hunting. Most of them will own a pistol or two but it's usually some kind of marginally useful thing that they've buggered to death after reading too many gun magazines.
When I was a brand-new Deputy Sheriff I had to buy a new duty weapon. My choice was, and still is, a Colt Officer's .45 ACP. Before I picked it up from my dealer I had them do a thorough inspection and adjustment. Their gun smith was a Colt armorer and he made the trigger absolute Series 80 perfection. So I stroll in to pick it up and there's a couple of Fudds standing around drinking cofee, wearing flannel shirts and hunting coats. One of them started on me about how I needed this or that special modification or doodad before the thing would really ever amount to anything. The owner of the shop jumped in and stated clearly that what I was buying wasn't a toy like they were accustomed to seeing, that it was a serious tool for serious business and his gun smith had it ready for me to be willing to bet my life on it. They didn't have a clue what he was talking about.
We get Fudds on this board every once in a while spouting off all sorts of downright dangerous information and cite their experience as a hunter as their authority. Every once in a while a politician will get a hold of a Fudd and have him go around talking like some sort of expert.
Response to Original message
60. How about..
Not sure if this one counts as a separate one, but the..
MGAFYGAE -- "MY guns are fine, YOUR guns are evil."
Black powder guns, revolvers, traditionally stocked shotguns, deer rifles, even 1911's- "But I {or Dad, or Granddad, or Uncle Duke} had / have one of those, so they're perfectly fine. The rest of your guns? Ban 'em."
friendly_iconoclast
Response to Reply #60
61. That's a good one. A variant is the "Uncle Ruckus"
Claiming to be a gun owner and/or very familiar with guns, and yet continually putting down other gun owners
jeepnstein
66. They're called "Fudds".
While I personally have nothing against Elmer Fudd and his War on Rabbits, his human counterparts are obnoxious at times.
They'll wax poetic about how this or that firearm is beyond reproach or ban because it has some sporting use. They constantly want to make the 2nd Amendment about hunting. Most of them will own a pistol or two but it's usually some kind of marginally useful thing that they've buggered to death after reading too many gun magazines.
When I was a brand-new Deputy Sheriff I had to buy a new duty weapon. My choice was, and still is, a Colt Officer's .45 ACP. Before I picked it up from my dealer I had them do a thorough inspection and adjustment. Their gun smith was a Colt armorer and he made the trigger absolute Series 80 perfection. So I stroll in to pick it up and there's a couple of Fudds standing around drinking cofee, wearing flannel shirts and hunting coats. One of them started on me about how I needed this or that special modification or doodad before the thing would really ever amount to anything. The owner of the shop jumped in and stated clearly that what I was buying wasn't a toy like they were accustomed to seeing, that it was a serious tool for serious business and his gun smith had it ready for me to be willing to bet my life on it. They didn't have a clue what he was talking about.
We get Fudds on this board every once in a while spouting off all sorts of downright dangerous information and cite their experience as a hunter as their authority. Every once in a while a politician will get a hold of a Fudd and have him go around talking like some sort of expert.
The entire thread can be found at:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x361725#361725
The disinterested reader will quickly notice that there is little new under the
gun control sun...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Lololol.. what next.. why we should give credibility to the Trump lobby?
whereisjustice
Mar 2016
#23
If it makes you feel better to act out, by all means go ahead and do so...
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2016
#24
Why, of *course* it is! Don't you feel better now, having got that out of your system?
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2016
#28
Keep going...I wouldn't want your behavior to differ from that of the vast majority...
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2016
#30
Well, considering that the number of firearms has gone up dramatically in the country,
GGJohn
Mar 2016
#6
Firearms-related accidental injuries have been trending downward for decades.
Lizzie Poppet
Mar 2016
#17
The article states that her little boy wasn't strapped into his car seat, either.
NBachers
Mar 2016
#31