Israel/Palestine

sabbat hunter

(6,909 posts)

39. Israel needs to

Sun Dec 29, 2024, 08:54 PM

Dec 29

go to the UN and tell them the following
"we need an armed peacekeeping force in the WB and Gaza. We are going to pull out completely from those areas. Jerusalem will remain status quo. We will not pull out until that peacekeeping force is in place. If any new attacks come from those areas, the UN peacekeeping force will be at blame for not doing their jobs. Their job will be to disarm any groups other than from the elected government of the Palestinian people. Failure to do so will be 100% on their shoulders. They have to put in writing that they will accept this blame, and apologize to Israel for any attacks that happen. Israel on its part will negotiate with the elected government of the Palestinian people for a permanent peace treaty in which each side recognizes the other's right to exist as a nation.
The settlers in what is the WB, can remain, but they will no longer be under Israel protection. The UN peacekeeping force will be expected to disarm them as well. Those settlers living there, will be given Palestinian citizenship, will full, and equal rights.
The UN will also oversee free, and independent elections in Gaza and the WB for a new government/parliament."

I know this is highly unlikely to happen, but it is a dream.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Huh, that sounds a lot like "from the river to the sea". [View all] Eko Dec 28 OP

In terms of security he's right. Mosby Dec 28 #1

I'm sure the Palestinians who say it aren't thinking about their security. Eko Dec 28 #2

That was always their plan. Drive all the Palestinians from Gaza into Egypt. patphil Dec 28 #3

Except Egypt won't take a single Palestinian. Mosby Dec 28 #4

That's a horrible argument in many ways. Eko Dec 28 #5

Not nearly as horrible as patphi's argument. Mosby Dec 28 #7

You should just be able to agree that it is a horrible argument without having to turn around and attack someone else. Eko Dec 28 #9

If you think their argument is horrible then make your case to them just like I did. Eko Dec 28 #10

You didn't make much of a case, and one extremely tenuous claim does not comprise "reasons". lapucelle Dec 29 #11

Its nothing like it except for the part where they wont take them in. Eko Dec 29 #15

Your citation reads "The United States and the Refugee Crisis, 1938-41" lapucelle Dec 29 #18

I never said anything about post WW2. Eko Dec 29 #22

And "at the end of WWII " is not post WW2 either. Eko Dec 29 #23

So now the contention is that UN Resolution 181 lapucelle Dec 29 #25

I never said that either. Eko Dec 29 #26

I said. Eko Dec 29 #27

Keep digging. lapucelle Dec 29 #30

Well I will bow to you as to the exact time frame I was talking about when I did not give an exact time frame. Eko Dec 29 #37

Are you sure about that? AloeVera Dec 29 #16

Yes, I'm sure about it. "Someone said something half a century ago" is not convincing evidence lapucelle Dec 29 #17

You obviously missed the point on purpose. AloeVera Dec 29 #21

How about a different reason from recently? Eko Dec 29 #24

That doesn't explain concrete and steel walls lapucelle Dec 29 #29

I think you can be against the smuggling of arms to a terrorist origination which was why the area was cleared Eko Dec 29 #38

I beg your pardon. This statement of yours is almost laughable. brush Dec 29 #28

Sounds like Israel needs a final solution to the Palestinian problem. Bok_Tukalo Dec 28 #6

What do you suggest? A single state? Mosby Dec 28 #8

Thanks to Trump voters, third party voters, and the Abandon Harris movement lapucelle Dec 29 #12

I still think Netanyahu is going to be removed or step down soon Mosby Dec 29 #32

"" The idea of annexing the OTs is wishful thinking promoted by a small minority of Israelis "" Israeli Tuesday #44

Then get rid of the coalition system Mosby Tuesday #47

Still cant get over the fact that you are calling .... Israeli Wednesday #49

Yup. JohnSJ Dec 29 #33

Absolutely agree with you Israeli Tuesday #43

I wonder how many posters here who have an anti/Israeli bias even JohnSJ Dec 29 #31

"coed"??? EarnestPutz Dec 29 #35

A "genocidal statement", no? AloeVera Dec 29 #13

The goose-stepping imagery is entirely coincidental and unintentional. AloeVera Dec 29 #14

"Of course I'm not serious." lapucelle Dec 29 #19

Ah the mocking and selective cutting and pasting... AloeVera Dec 29 #20

That's from 1977, things change. Mosby Dec 29 #34

Plus ca change... AloeVera Dec 29 #36

The Likud hasnt changed Israeli Tuesday #45

Israel needs to sabbat hunter Dec 29 #39

Dream on ..... Israeli Tuesday #46

I said sabbat hunter Tuesday #48

For a 'peacekeeping' force to be effective, surely there must be peace first? Aussie105 Dec 30 #40

Yeah they don't want peace, and that's why they started the war on 10/7 right? ZRB Jan 2 #41

Is that why they signed treaties with both Sundance1220 Tuesday #42