Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Israeli

(4,310 posts)
7. Huh ?
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 09:26 AM
Apr 2016

Its from the same link I posted before ....the one you obviously did not read .

Here you want it in full ....you got it :

Temple Institute claims it held secret Jewish wedding on Temple Mount

Organization aimed at establishing Third Temple says groom made wedding vows as one of the wedding's witnesses distracted police and Waqf; unusual event could reignite violence at the sensitive holy site and elsewhere.

Roi Yanovsky, Kobi Nachshoni
Published: 04.13.16, 00:33 / Israel News

The Temple Institute, an organization whose self-declared goal is to "establish the Third Temple," claimed on Tuesday evening that it held a secret Jewish wedding on the Temple Mount in what could reignite hostilities at the sensitive holy site and elsewhere.

A post on the Temple Institute's Facebook page claims that Rabbi Chaim Richman, who manages the institute's international activity, accepted a request by a couple who asked him to marry them at the holy site after examining the halacha and consulting with other adjudicators.

The institute said the wedding ceremony on the Temple Mount is a great achievement "in light of the Waqf and the police's anti-Jewish discrimination, which rejects any Jewish expression at the holy site."

According to the institute, the couple met with the rabbi several days ago in Jerusalem's Old City, where the blessing over the wine was made.

The institute claims the bride and groom, the rabbi and witnesses met at the entrance to the Temple Mount compound.

While walking along the Temple Mount's eastern perimeter and making sure neither the police nor the Waqf's men noticed what they were doing, the groom recited the declaration: "Behold, you are consecrated to me with this ring according to the law of Moses and Israel" and put a ring on his bride's finger while the witnesses looked on.

The institute claims that moment was documented, but the couple has asked that the video is not released in full. Instead, the institute posted photos of the married couple's ringed-fingers without exposing their identity.

"The ancient custom of brides and grooms arriving at the Temple Mount separately on their wedding day has been upheld in recent years, but an actual wedding on the Temple Mount is a unique event in history, since the Temple's destruction 2,000 years ago," the institute said.

A man who was involved in the planning of the secret ceremony claimed it happened last week. "A group of 13 Jews went on the Temple Mount. One of them caused a diversion to make the police and the Waqf look towards the Dome of the Rock. Then, while another person was hiding the couple, the vows were made."

He said all those involved were asked to keep the ceremony a secret.

The Headquarters of Temple Organizations said they "congratulate the new couple for their marriage on the holy mountain. There's no place like that place to start a life of holiness. However, it is very regretful that such an act has become rare due to the authorities' illegal policy of discrimination on the Temple Mount, which forbids any Jewish expression at the site."

This is an unusual event in the volatile area, known to Muslims as the Noble Sanctuary and to Jews as Temple Mount, where Jews are not allowed to pray.

The status quo on the Temple Mount upholds a rule that has effectively existed since 1187, when Muslim warrior Saladin defeated the Christian crusaders and held on to Jerusalem: non-Muslims may enter the sacred compound, but only Muslims can pray.

Before Muslims built the Dome of the Rock and the Aqsa mosque in the late 7th and early 8th centuries, two Jewish temples, the second destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD, stood at the site, which is both the holiest place in Islam outside Saudi Arabia and the most sacred place in Judaism.

After Israel captured the Old City and East Jerusalem in the 1967Six-Day War, it agreed to continue the status quo, recognizing the risks of igniting a religious war if anything were changed. It gave Jordan special responsibility for overseeing the Muslim holy sites via the Waqf, an Islamic trust.

That agreement was reinforced when Israel signed a peace treaty with Jordan in 1994. There have been many periods of friction over the years, but to all intents and purposes, the status quo has held.

Over the last decade or so, since then-opposition leader Ariel Sharon visited the site in 2000, the Waqf says Israel has been slowly chipping away at the rules, with increasing numbers of religious Jews visiting the area and many of them surreptitiously praying.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected those suggestions, saying repeatedly that the government has not changed the rules and has no intention of doing so.

Meanwhile, every week, police detains and at times also arrests right-wing activists on suspicion of praying or violating the rules in another manner.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4790850,00.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

" ....the deadly and patently false narrative that Jews intend to seize and destroy al-Aksa " Israeli Apr 2016 #1
Accusing Jews in general of things that only a tiny minority of extremists do.... shira Apr 2016 #2
I can't believe you compare leftynyc Apr 2016 #4
I cant believe you overlooked this ...... Israeli Apr 2016 #5
Awwwww leftynyc Apr 2016 #6
Huh ? Israeli Apr 2016 #7
Playing coy now? Since when do a few extremist Jews represent Jews in general? shira Apr 2016 #10
Netanyahu happens to be a good friend of Yehuda Glick, who is also a potential Likud Knesset Knesset Little Tich Apr 2016 #9
So what has changed? You accuse Israel of trying to change the status quo. shira Apr 2016 #11
I still remember in October leftynyc Apr 2016 #3
Al Aqsa is literally a monument to imperialism Albertoo May 2016 #31
I didn't know that leftynyc May 2016 #32
al Aqsa mosque was rebuilt a few times. Albertoo May 2016 #36
The OP conveniently forgets that the cause of the current violence resulted from Israeli attempts to Little Tich Apr 2016 #8
A new bill proposed? Holy fucking shit! Damned democracies! Now tell me, did it pass? n/t shira Apr 2016 #12
Do you think that there isn't any possibility whatsoever that the Knesset would pass a bill that Little Tich Apr 2016 #13
No possibility, as it would violate terms with Jordan. shira May 2016 #15
It's fascinating how we can draw opposite conclusions from the same evidence. n/t Little Tich May 2016 #18
This is about your false claim of Israel changing the status quo. When that happens.... shira May 2016 #21
You want to complain about BILLS that leftynyc May 2016 #14
The hypocrisy is just unreal, isn't it? n/t shira May 2016 #16
I don't mind people leftynyc May 2016 #17
I'm not sure what the fuss is all about. Little Tich May 2016 #19
FINALLY leftynyc May 2016 #20
So the "al Buraq plaza" is the correct name then? n/t Little Tich May 2016 #30
LOL - no leftynyc May 2016 #35
The fuss is that you support Muslims discrimination vs. Jews @ their holiest site. shira May 2016 #44
This Irish Atheist says demolish the damned mosque and build the temple The Green Manalishi May 2016 #22
the temple mount is 27 acres Mosby May 2016 #23
yep. The Green Manalishi May 2016 #24
When was Mecca ever a Jewish Holy Site? aranthus May 2016 #25
Tit for tat. The Green Manalishi May 2016 #26
That's just silly. aranthus May 2016 #27
Well, I think *all* religions are silly, and NONE of them should have exclusivity The Green Manalishi May 2016 #28
The fact that you don't respect religions at all disqualifies you from the discussion. n/t aranthus May 2016 #29
Then flag my post or report me to the Admin The Green Manalishi May 2016 #34
I didn't say you did anything wrong. aranthus May 2016 #38
Actually, I am only trying to be respectful of something I hold in contempt (religion) The Green Manalishi May 2016 #45
They have control over the Temple Mount leftynyc May 2016 #40
They should take it back. EOM The Green Manalishi May 2016 #46
Wait a minute leftynyc May 2016 #33
I'm concerned about overt religious display aranthus May 2016 #37
I agree about the Temple Mount leftynyc May 2016 #39
On that we agree. aranthus May 2016 #41
Yes it is leftynyc May 2016 #42
The Israel haters don't just shy away from this topic... shira May 2016 #47
On that we agree. And sorry The Green Manalishi May 2016 #43
No worries leftynyc May 2016 #48
Actually I was apologizing to the other guy The Green Manalishi May 2016 #49
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»The Temple Mount - Radica...»Reply #7