Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

patphil

(8,733 posts)

2. Besides being extremely vulnerable, they're slow and take too much time to move into position.

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Mon Jan 5, 2026, 04:36 PM

Monday

No amount of armor can protect these floating boat anchors from destruction. They amount to multi-billion dollar monuments to a madman's ego.
In fact, they'll never be commissioned as they're obsolete before they're built.
This is just another massive waste of money and resources springing forth from what's left of the mind of our nearly brain dead president.
I would say this is all being done to enrich the shipbuilding companies.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ballrooms on Water? Some Potential Design Issues with Trump Class Battleships [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Monday OP

We might as well stack pallets of bundled cash on huge barges and assign one guy with a Red Ryder BB gun to each... wcmagumba Monday #1

Besides being extremely vulnerable, they're slow and take too much time to move into position. patphil Monday #2