Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(132,916 posts)
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 04:21 PM Monday

Ballrooms on Water? Some Potential Design Issues with Trump Class Battleships

High above the Arctic Circle but warmed by the Gulfstream, the port of Tromsø is gateway to northern Norway. It is also final resting place of the German battleship Tirpitz. She was sunk by a formation of British Lancaster bombers on November 12, 1944. Air attacks have doomed other great warships — the Yamato, Bismarck, Prince of Wales —to Davey Jones’ Locker. Memo to Trump: Battle wagons have become an extinct naval species.

Only they are now being recycled by our 47th president. As millions of his countrymen stand to lose medical coverage, POTUS wants to build us two “Trump Class” battleships.

Along with Greenland, the ships are deemed needed for national defense, another sign that George III was not the first mad king to rule over America. Sixteen-inch guns can give off a thunderous salute, to match an aerial flyover. Our POTUS specializes in strategic bling.

The Secretary of War, in letting shipbuilding contracts for the Trump’s warships, should flag certain design features. The Brits laid out a class of fast, powerful warships early in the 20th century, fast and lethal. But they had a flaw — insufficient armor on the ships’ upper decks.

https://www.postalley.org/2025/12/31/ballrooms-on-water-some-potential-design-issues-with-trump-class-battleships/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ballrooms on Water? Some Potential Design Issues with Trump Class Battleships (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Monday OP
We might as well stack pallets of bundled cash on huge barges and assign one guy with a Red Ryder BB gun to each... wcmagumba Monday #1
Besides being extremely vulnerable, they're slow and take too much time to move into position. patphil Monday #2

wcmagumba

(5,653 posts)
1. We might as well stack pallets of bundled cash on huge barges and assign one guy with a Red Ryder BB gun to each...
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 04:26 PM
Monday

Good plan Spanky...

patphil

(8,733 posts)
2. Besides being extremely vulnerable, they're slow and take too much time to move into position.
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 04:36 PM
Monday

No amount of armor can protect these floating boat anchors from destruction. They amount to multi-billion dollar monuments to a madman's ego.
In fact, they'll never be commissioned as they're obsolete before they're built.
This is just another massive waste of money and resources springing forth from what's left of the mind of our nearly brain dead president.
I would say this is all being done to enrich the shipbuilding companies.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Ballrooms on Water? Some ...