Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

BOSSHOG

(44,621 posts)

2. They said NO because it was the right thing to do

Reply to Dulcinea (Original post)

Fri Dec 12, 2025, 07:39 AM

Dec 12

The decision made by any state legislature should have been easy. It’s dealing with a selfish petulant child. His concern is not for any state, just packing legislatures with lemmings. We’ve forgotten he’s a convicted felon, an adjudicated rapist and he’s waiting on Epstein to become public. He’s low life scum supported by low life scum.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

niyad CozyMystery

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The deeply personal reasons why many Indiana Senate Republicans said no to Trump [View all] Dulcinea Dec 12 OP

She voted for him three times Blumancru Dec 12 #1

They said NO because it was the right thing to do BOSSHOG Dec 12 #2

Nonsense. They didn't care a bit about the right thing when it was others being doxxed or threatened Blumancru Dec 12 #3

They didn't do it because it was the right thing to do BOSSHOG Dec 12 #4

Self preservation. House of Roberts Dec 12 #5

Yep. If you create more red districts, you have to get those red voters from somewhere. Blumancru Dec 12 #7

Only when her grandson got hit did she give a damn. Irish_Dem Dec 12 #6

Kick dalton99a Dec 12 #8

Some did not want their lily-white districts to add minority voters. Midnight Writer Dec 12 #9