Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Ol Janx Spirit

(999 posts)

5. Ah, yet, in the end she will be a yes.... All Rs will. How can you not fund a "war" in the middle of said "war"?

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Fri Mar 20, 2026, 07:13 AM

Yesterday

They will just agree to pay for it on the backs of those that can't afford it as they always do.

Will they ask billionaires to give up any of their tax breaks? No.

Will they ask the Administration to scale back on their reckless immigration actions? No.

They will squeeze everyone below the millionaire class even harder as they always do.

That's all they ever do, and Boebert will be there for it regardless of what she says today....

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Multichromatic Prof. Toru Tanaka MrsCheaplaugh AloeVera provocateur7

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Boebert Comes Out Swinging Against Trump Admin. Request for Iran War Money: 'I'm Not Doing That' [View all] riversedge Yesterday OP

She just won reelection so trump cant hurt her. Callie1979 Yesterday #1

Sure he can... 2naSalit Yesterday #4

Huh? She won in 2024. Wiz Imp Yesterday #8

She's vulnerable this year, but I think her position generalbetrayus Yesterday #11

I don't necessarily disagree with that. Wiz Imp Yesterday #12

This message was self-deleted by its author Callie1979 Yesterday #16

Miracles CAN happen; but her opposition is set. Qualifying is over. She'll win Callie1979 Yesterday #18

Wrong on all counts. Colorado's primary isn't until June 30 🙄 Wiz Imp Yesterday #21

Not wrong at all. I said qualifying is over. Her opposition is set. Totally true. Callie1979 20 hrs ago #24

Nope. Almost everything you have said has been wrong until you changed your claims Wiz Imp 16 hrs ago #31

Could this also be good news here other than her surprising but welcome hell no? yonder Yesterday #2

This country has sunk so low mgardener Yesterday #3

So far she's also stood firm on the Epstein coverup. Callie1979 Yesterday #17

Ah, yet, in the end she will be a yes.... All Rs will. How can you not fund a "war" in the middle of said "war"? Ol Janx Spirit Yesterday #5

That's the problem. We know this woman's ethics. Bluetus Yesterday #14

she won't until she does. nt Javaman Yesterday #6

Asking for MORE money for a war that DID NOT get approval for ProudMNDemocrat Yesterday #7

At least she's consistent on this and on the Epstein thing Prairie Gates Yesterday #9

No worries, just take the money from unnecessary things like education, healthcare, and feeding hungry people groundloop Yesterday #10

Not even if..... SergeStorms Yesterday #13

You funny! generalbetrayus Yesterday #15

The the title of the article would be "Boebert comes out jacking!" mdbl Yesterday #19

It pays to be.... SergeStorms 16 hrs ago #30

That's funny MustLoveBeagles Yesterday #22

War is costing a billion a day popsdenver Yesterday #20

Was she hit by lightning or something??? orangecrush Yesterday #23

Actually, she's being consistent on policy, IMHO--- Trump PROMISED 'no more wars', Jack Valentino 17 hrs ago #29

Be very wary. She has a habit of saying stuff kind of like that and then finding a tricky way to do the opposite. Trust_Reality 20 hrs ago #25

Republicans in disarray IronLionZion 20 hrs ago #26

Geez, what's her problem? Omnipresent 19 hrs ago #27

In this context, I believe her 'America first' comment means spending the money at home, Jack Valentino 17 hrs ago #28