Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(61,119 posts)
42. Thanks for explaining. And I'll accept your explanation because I would like to believe that people on
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 09:25 AM
21 hrs ago

this board will be honest about AI use - we liberals are supposed to be ethical - but I can't deny that I still feel a little bit of skepticism because you use genAI and defend its use.

And that's a fundamentally unethical choice, because you know how AI models were trained, and you're aware of the harm it does.

To me, the AI companies' theft of the world's intellectual property is an absolute wrong. There was never any excuse for it. And it's continuing, every second of every day.

You can't ignore that and decide it's just fine to use genAI (when you aren't being forced to) without making a decision that the rights of all the people whose work was stolen DON'T MATTER.

And honestly, that leaves me wondering if you'd have been just fine with other great injustices throughout history, including slavery, as long as that injustice created some benefit for you.

I've hated seeing DUers using genAI and pushing its use, because to me that's a betrayal of everything liberals and progressives are supposed to stand for.

It's a selective blindness that permits you to enjoy a technology that would not exist without that theft.

I expect DUers to be better than that. To care about the greatest theft of intellectual property in history.

I expect DUers to care about all the other harm done by genAI and the AI companies and AI bros, who are every bit as much a threat to society and the natural environment as the Trump regime is.

Instead, some people who should be more ethical than that are apparently choosing that selective blindness so they can pretend to have knowledge they don't have and don't want to bother to look up. Or pretend to write better than they can. Or pretend they can create music or images or video, when they never bothered to acquire those skills.

Even if those AI users are still ethical in other areas of their lives, their voluntary use of genAI says they're willing to sell at least part of their soul to enable fraud and support oligarchs out to crush the people who provide the world's knowledge and culture.

There are times I want to chalk up AI-using liberals making that deal with devils to naivete - and there are probably a few AI users who aren't aware that genAI exists only because of theft. But most AI users know about that theft, and I've been posting about it for three years on DU.

So what I'm seeing is a lot of people who consider themselves liberal but are anything but liberal - are fans and supporters of AI robber barons and all the harm they do - when they voluntarily use genAI, circulate AI slop because they like it, and defend its use.

I'd simply find this disgusting if RWers were doing it. The theft of the world's intellectual property is a natural fit with RWers.

But when I see liberals happy to use genAI without being forced to, what I feel instead is almost incredulous disappointment, and heartbreak, and betrayal.

Because your embrace of genAI is a betrayal of everyone whose work was stolen, and a betrayal of humanity in general.

Being pro-genAI is being anti-human.

And I hope everyone who's AI-addled figures that out before they sleepwalk out on that genAI plank into a future controlled by tech oligarchs, frauds using genAI, and hallucinating chatbots.

And btw, I'm not the only person who sees genAI and the tech lords controlling it as just as great a threat as Trump is. Maybe a greater threat.

Will Bunch wrote this yesterday:

Is AI's authoritarianism a bigger threat than Trump's?
https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/ai-advances-anthropic-claude-20260219.html

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What could go wrong? FalloutShelter Tuesday #1
I hope all these products FAIL!!!! Multichromatic Tuesday #2
I have Ray-Ban Meta's that have been out for a couple of years now Polybius Tuesday #6
Because most people don't want to have to wonder if anyone wearing glasses is taking photos and/or highplainsdem Tuesday #9
Ray-Ban Meta's are a lot different than small companies who put out similar glasses Polybius Tuesday #10
Meta is planning to add facial recognition to its smart glasses. I guess you missed the news. highplainsdem Tuesday #12
No, we were talking about currently, not speculation on the future Polybius Tuesday #13
I don't believe there aren't ways to disable that light, or that it can't simply stop working. And highplainsdem Tuesday #14
There are ways, but it's quite complicated Polybius Tuesday #16
Btw, would you trust anyone wearing smart glasses and watching children to be watching innocently, highplainsdem Tuesday #15
I would thoroughly vet anyone around my kids Polybius Tuesday #17
No, we don't have to tolerate people wearing glasses that could be recording and storing photos, highplainsdem Tuesday #18
Google Glass was discontinued because it was expensive and the technology wasn't there yet in 2013 Polybius Wednesday #20
The reasons Google Glass was discontinued usually have privacy concerns at or near the top. Tech highplainsdem Wednesday #21
Smart glasses don't create new surveillance, they operate within the same legal framework Polybius Wednesday #28
You're much too trusting of AI companies and how desperate they always are for more training data. highplainsdem Wednesday #29
You're right about one thing: distrust of large tech companies is understandable Polybius Thursday #33
The formatting of your reply is very reminiscent of outputs from genAI. You're defending/promoting highplainsdem Thursday #35
I'll clear this up directly: it's me writing the replies Polybius Thursday #41
Thanks for explaining. And I'll accept your explanation because I would like to believe that people on highplainsdem 21 hrs ago #42
Thank you for accepting my explanation, you are a great person Polybius 10 hrs ago #43
Some Reddit threads on what people think of people wearing smart glasses: highplainsdem Wednesday #30
I honestly don't care what a handful of Reddit threads say Polybius Thursday #34
This. And people are defending it. travelingthrulife Wednesday #22
To all those consuming morons willing to buy this junk, I would like to quote Jim Morrison by saying.... Crowman2009 Tuesday #3
"They were a double pair of Joo Janta 200 Super-Chromatic Peril Sensitive Sunglasses" muriel_volestrangler Tuesday #4
LOL... Thank you for my laugh of the day FemDemERA Tuesday #5
I have zero doubt that the people who buy these products Skittles Tuesday #7
Just........ Red Mountain Tuesday #8
Google's brand of smart glasses, Google Glass, were discontinued soon after they were introduced highplainsdem Tuesday #11
Reminds me of this parody. Crowman2009 Tuesday #19
Just no! SheltieLover Wednesday #23
They are trying to normalize surveillance! SheltieLover Wednesday #24
Yes! And it surprises and disappoints me that any Democrats, any liberals, would be okay with this, highplainsdem Wednesday #25
Absolutely in agreement with all you've stated! SheltieLover Wednesday #27
I wouldn't want an apple product unless it was made of gold and given to me by cook yaesu Wednesday #26
I'm still waiting for my Honewell kitchen computer... hunter Wednesday #31
That ad is so hilarious - and sexist. highplainsdem Thursday #36
It keeps them out of trouble. hunter Thursday #38
I plan to sell my house so I can buy all those goodies! chouchou Thursday #32
The prices are coming down, unfortunately. Which means that more and more teachers will have to highplainsdem Thursday #37
Your words are true. Personally, I've never liked the idea that some students can easily... chouchou Thursday #39
Oh great, now jealous husbands can spy on their wives FakeNoose Thursday #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Apple is reportedly plann...»Reply #42