Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(61,095 posts)
21. The reasons Google Glass was discontinued usually have privacy concerns at or near the top. Tech
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 09:30 AM
Yesterday

prices typically come down quickly. Privacy concerns don't go away.

Second, the idea that this is about “surreptitious” recording ignores the built-in safeguards. The glasses have a mandatory recording LED that cannot simply be covered to keep filming — the device literally won’t record if you block it. That’s more transparency than most phones provide. With a phone, someone can appear to be texting while recording. With these glasses, there’s a visible signal by design.


Sigh. Just google

can smart glasses led light be disabled

and you'll quickly find lots of results on disabling that light, such as this one:

https://www.404media.co/how-to-disable-meta-rayban-led-light/

See the article with video below, which I saw mentioned on social media by people commenting that those being recorded didn't notice the LED light or know what meant.

https://euroweeklynews.com/2025/12/06/ai-glasses-spark-rip-privacy-alarm-in-the-netherlands-a-new-era-of-recognition/

See this Reddit thread

https://www.reddit.com/r/RaybanMeta/comments/1n80c1o/is_the_led_light_super_noticeable/

and the comments in the replies about people being recorded not noticing the LED light at all (especially in bright light, like on a sunny day), and people using these surveillance devices buying stickers to block the LED lights without shutting off the camera, or just drilling out the light while keeping the camera functioning.

Your saying you woudn't record surreptitiously does nothing to assure anyone that others using them won't use them that way.

You're also ignoring the fact that AI companies are data-gathering, using pretty much everything collected for training their AI, and they WILL share that data with authorities including the Trump regime.

So even if you think you're recording just for yourself, you have no way of assuring anyone around you that the Trump regime won't end up with everything your smart glasses capture.

Someone wearing smart glasses and recording at a protest is a threat to everyone at the protest. Someone using a smart phone just to openly record ICE agents is much less likely to end up providing closeup shots of other protesters to federal authorities, or conversations that ICE might think make them a threat to ICE officers who aren't breaking the law, or to Trump. Do you really want to record some angry remark about Trump that could get someone reported to the Secret Service and prosecuted, when they hadn't been serious about what they said and retracted it a second later?

Even if you aren't using facial recognition software, you can't stop others from using that software on what you record.

You're effectively mobile surveillance for the AI bros and government, every time you use smart glasses to record.

And there WILL be creeps using this software to record because they're perverts or hope to record something for blackmail or just to embarrass others.

Your use of AI, all by itself, counts against you being as trustworthy as you would be otherwise, since AI is so often used for fraud of different types, from students cheating, to workers pretending to have done work they had AI do instead, to scams by professional criminals.

Wanting to use AI without others seeing you use a smartphone, and record without an obvious camera including a smartphone camera, does suggest possible deceit even more, and not just convenience for you.

And this could end up making people wearing ordinary glasses appear suspicious at first, which would be really unfair to them.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What could go wrong? FalloutShelter Tuesday #1
I hope all these products FAIL!!!! Multichromatic Tuesday #2
I have Ray-Ban Meta's that have been out for a couple of years now Polybius Tuesday #6
Because most people don't want to have to wonder if anyone wearing glasses is taking photos and/or highplainsdem Tuesday #9
Ray-Ban Meta's are a lot different than small companies who put out similar glasses Polybius Tuesday #10
Meta is planning to add facial recognition to its smart glasses. I guess you missed the news. highplainsdem Tuesday #12
No, we were talking about currently, not speculation on the future Polybius Tuesday #13
I don't believe there aren't ways to disable that light, or that it can't simply stop working. And highplainsdem Tuesday #14
There are ways, but it's quite complicated Polybius Tuesday #16
Btw, would you trust anyone wearing smart glasses and watching children to be watching innocently, highplainsdem Tuesday #15
I would thoroughly vet anyone around my kids Polybius Tuesday #17
No, we don't have to tolerate people wearing glasses that could be recording and storing photos, highplainsdem Tuesday #18
Google Glass was discontinued because it was expensive and the technology wasn't there yet in 2013 Polybius Yesterday #20
The reasons Google Glass was discontinued usually have privacy concerns at or near the top. Tech highplainsdem Yesterday #21
Smart glasses don't create new surveillance, they operate within the same legal framework Polybius 16 hrs ago #28
You're much too trusting of AI companies and how desperate they always are for more training data. highplainsdem 15 hrs ago #29
You're right about one thing: distrust of large tech companies is understandable Polybius 8 hrs ago #33
The formatting of your reply is very reminiscent of outputs from genAI. You're defending/promoting highplainsdem 2 hrs ago #35
Some Reddit threads on what people think of people wearing smart glasses: highplainsdem 15 hrs ago #30
I honestly don't care what a handful of Reddit threads say Polybius 7 hrs ago #34
This. And people are defending it. travelingthrulife Yesterday #22
To all those consuming morons willing to buy this junk, I would like to quote Jim Morrison by saying.... Crowman2009 Tuesday #3
"They were a double pair of Joo Janta 200 Super-Chromatic Peril Sensitive Sunglasses" muriel_volestrangler Tuesday #4
LOL... Thank you for my laugh of the day FemDemERA Tuesday #5
I have zero doubt that the people who buy these products Skittles Tuesday #7
Just........ Red Mountain Tuesday #8
Google's brand of smart glasses, Google Glass, were discontinued soon after they were introduced highplainsdem Tuesday #11
Reminds me of this parody. Crowman2009 Tuesday #19
Just no! SheltieLover Yesterday #23
They are trying to normalize surveillance! SheltieLover Yesterday #24
Yes! And it surprises and disappoints me that any Democrats, any liberals, would be okay with this, highplainsdem Yesterday #25
Absolutely in agreement with all you've stated! SheltieLover Yesterday #27
I wouldn't want an apple product unless it was made of gold and given to me by cook yaesu Yesterday #26
I'm still waiting for my Honewell kitchen computer... hunter 14 hrs ago #31
That ad is so hilarious - and sexist. highplainsdem 2 hrs ago #36
It keeps them out of trouble. hunter 35 min ago #38
I plan to sell my house so I can buy all those goodies! chouchou 13 hrs ago #32
The prices are coming down, unfortunately. Which means that more and more teachers will have to highplainsdem 2 hrs ago #37
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Apple is reportedly plann...»Reply #21