Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

gab13by13

(31,063 posts)

1. I mean "c'mon man,

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sun Dec 21, 2025, 12:45 PM

Sunday

First of all the initial release was supposed to be the initial and final release, the law was to release all the files.

Second, "the release was inadequate." WTF, the release was illegal, a slap in the face to the court. The pitiful release was done to protect sex-traffickers and pedophiles.

This is why I am calling for Malcolm Nance, or someone similar to run for president in 2028.

The old rules and laws do not apply, we need to fight fire with fire.

"there needs to be an explanation." is there any weaker sauce than that statement? We know why they did this, to protect Krasnov and others.

A stern letter to Bondi and Blanche would be better.

Marjorie Taylor Greene gave a blistering statement.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

IzzaNuDay duckworth969

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jeffries: DOJ release of Epstein files 'inadequate' and 'falls short of what the law requires' [View all] BumRushDaShow Sunday OP

I mean "c'mon man, gab13by13 Sunday #1

LAFO? Roy Rolling Sunday #2

cool FredGarvin Sunday #3

They had time to draft Article ofImpeachment for her, FirstLight Sunday #4

Hey Rep. Jeffries: Inadequate? Try unacceptable! IzzaNuDay Sunday #5

No, Miguelito Loveless Monday #6