Jeffries: DOJ release of Epstein files 'inadequate' and 'falls short of what the law requires'
Source: ABC News
December 21, 2025, 11:47 AM
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., on Sunday criticized the partial release of files relating to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epsteins abuse after the Justice Department released a trove of redacted files Friday.
"Congress has acted decisively, bipartisan majorities in both the House and the Senate, bill signed into law by the president, and it does appear, of course, that this initial document release is inadequate. It falls short of what the law requires," Jeffries told ABC News' "This Week" co-anchor Jonathan Karl.
Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., said he and Rep. Thomas Massie -- his Republican partner in the effort to pass the Epstein Files Transparency Act -- are considering filing impeachment articles against Attorney General Pam Bondi over the apparent lack of compliance with the law.
"Well, I think there needs to be a full and complete explanation and then a full and complete investigation as to why the document production has fallen short of what the law clearly requires," Jeffries said. "And so the next step in the process is going to be that written justification to try to explain to the Congress, to the survivors, most importantly, and to the American people.
Pressed on whether that's on the table, Jeffries did not answer directly.
Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jeffries-doj-release-epstein-files-inadequate-andfalls-short/story?id=128597125
gab13by13
(31,053 posts)First of all the initial release was supposed to be the initial and final release, the law was to release all the files.
Second, "the release was inadequate." WTF, the release was illegal, a slap in the face to the court. The pitiful release was done to protect sex-traffickers and pedophiles.
This is why I am calling for Malcolm Nance, or someone similar to run for president in 2028.
The old rules and laws do not apply, we need to fight fire with fire.
"there needs to be an explanation." is there any weaker sauce than that statement? We know why they did this, to protect Krasnov and others.
A stern letter to Bondi and Blanche would be better.
Marjorie Taylor Greene gave a blistering statement.
Roy Rolling
(7,392 posts)Law and fucking order?
FredGarvin
(782 posts)glad to see his concern
FirstLight
(15,757 posts)They had time to be prepared to ACTUALLY take ACTION when this went south, which we ALLknew it would.
I'm really getting tired of hand wriniging and no action
IzzaNuDay
(1,224 posts)Tell DOJ in no uncertain terms this is bloody disgusting and unacceptable. Dont mince words. DOJ didnt understand the assignment!
Miguelito Loveless
(5,395 posts)it was a flagrant and wilful violation of the law, and they are daring you to do something about it.