Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump expected to take control of USPS, fire postal board, officials say [View all]BumRushDaShow
(151,322 posts)I have had enough procurement training as a former fed supervisor, about the Antideficiency Act and much of the other federal financial laws, where civil servants were read the riot act to warn against violations.
I think the "problem" is that over many decades, judges are used to hearing all kinds of crap in trial court - much of it filled with hubris and hyperbole, so they have sensitized themselves to it, wave it away, and have a tendency towards "tuning it all out". They probably consider much that is presented before them being nothing more than lawyers "crying wolf".
HOWEVER, this is an extremely rare case where the alarm IS REAL and they MUST ACT.
I.e., it's just like a fire alarm in a building that might be faulty and continually goes off for weeks and months with no "real fire" present, and eventually people ignore it. But then you may have the one time when there IS a real fire and ignoring it can mean bad things.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):