Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

slumcamper

(1,750 posts)
14. Nobody is "reeling"
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 09:40 PM
Jan 11

Disclaimer: I didn't bother to read the article.

Here's the deal: certain monied interest who own and controls this entity is not bothered in the least by any purported "reeling."

Notwithstanding the reeling of those journalists who would otherwise do good works, the failure of this news pillar--to its owner--is tantamount to dropping and losing a quarter in a gutter. IT DOESN'T MATTER to Bezos.

Seriously. He and his ilk are laughing as we, hair afire, lament the rapid deconstruction of institutions and practices that most of society has long relied on as pillars of our cultural landscape.

Can we forge a new landscape;? Or am I envisioning a new country? The rapidity of change coupled with the fleeting of time suggest a "rupture" in the historical continuum--and that phenomenon warrants a much different discussion.



Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Someone needs to tell Mr. Big Shot Bezos that Magats don't read. Joinfortmill Jan 11 #1
And somebody had better tell the reporters that "defecting to the NYT" Bluetus Jan 11 #4
Right Roy Rolling Jan 11 #12
Staffers still need a paycheck Blue_Tires Jan 12 #37
He couldn't care less. This is all about winning billions in g'ment contracts. jvill Jan 11 #23
S100 million loss in a year? speak easy Jan 12 #25
No. It was obviously the plan all along. How to destroy a free press in just a few short years. ratchiweenie Jan 12 #26
nonsense speak easy Jan 12 #27
Not when you have more than you can spend in 100dreds of lifetimes. He could care less. By destroying a free press ratchiweenie Jan 12 #28
I tend to agree with you. yardwork Jan 12 #34
It's not really a newspaper any more Marthe48 Jan 11 #2
Look at the formula for articles. That explains everything. Bluetus Jan 11 #6
Yep...the first paragraph should contain the who, what, when, where, and why. Details in the following paragraphs. SeattleVet Jan 11 #17
The point is, they are in the clickbait business now, not the journalism business. Bluetus Jan 11 #19
They pointedly DON'T give the facts up front anymore FakeNoose Jan 12 #30
I thought that my attention span... skypilot Jan 11 #18
The billionaires seem hell bent on destroying the free press. Irish_Dem Jan 11 #3
Usually after a plague, we go through a period of enlightenment. Initech Jan 11 #22
This IS the plague 0rganism Jan 12 #36
The thing about these billionaires that climb to that level of wealth dgauss Jan 11 #5
Good. Scrivener7 Jan 11 #7
Maybe he can reduce the $600m wedding budget by 90% to offset the loss. live love laugh Jan 11 #8
If he were to lose Katcat Jan 11 #13
Dumped my Wapo subscription and my Amazon Prime. paleotn Jan 11 #9
My two cents Roy Rolling Jan 11 #10
I feel for those left behind at WaPo RainCaster Jan 11 #11
Nobody is "reeling" slumcamper Jan 11 #14
Note to Bezos Bozvotros Jan 11 #15
Sorry, dude, you ruined it Lulu KC Jan 11 #16
You bought it, you broke it? dickthegrouch Jan 12 #43
Sigh we are back in an extreme robber baron age I'm afraid. cstanleytech Jan 11 #20
He bought it to destroy it. Initech Jan 11 #21
If the report is accurate, the arrogant bezos brought this on himself, and I salute all those journalists who had the JohnSJ Jan 12 #24
I was particularly upset Danascot Jan 12 #29
When this happened, I BlueSky3 Jan 12 #31
Thanks for reminding me I could do that. Danascot Jan 12 #41
There will be more people leaving Blue_Tires Jan 12 #39
Indeed ck4829 Monday #46
Jennifer Rubin is BlueSky3 Jan 12 #32
I hate their new comments format. yardwork Jan 12 #35
Yes, the new BlueSky3 Jan 12 #42
I just unsubscribed from WaPo and subscribed to The Contrarian on Substack. yardwork Jan 13 #44
When I canceled after the Harris debacle, I had been paying $10 a month. They offered it for $4 a month Maeve Jan 12 #33
Piss on Bezos Blue_Tires Jan 12 #38
Remember when Bezos bought WaPo in 2013, and said he wouldn't interfere with the management of the paper? FakeNoose Jan 12 #40
Jeffy couldn't get his rocket up either tonekat Jan 13 #45
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jeff Bezos' WaPo reeling ...»Reply #14