Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(145,061 posts)
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 08:07 PM 20 hrs ago

Jeff Bezos' WaPo reeling from losses and 'internal drama' as Trump returns to DC: report

Source: Raw Story

January 11, 2025 12:47PM ET


At a time when the always newsworthy Donald Trump is headed back to the White House, the venerable Washington Post should be gearing up to cover his second term but instead is being subjected to an exodus of top reporters and internal strife, reports the Wall Street Journal's Alexandra Bruell.

In her report for the Journal, Bruell notes that Amazon founder and billionaire Jeff Bezos, who bought the Post in 2013 for $250 million, just watched his investment lose around $100 million last year as new management has failed to stop the bleeding.

The Journal also reports that top-flight journalists are also fleeing to greener pastures under the management of interim executive editor Matt Murray and publisher William Lewis who has still not righted the ship since his hiring. Adding to the Post's problems was a decision to spike an endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris before the 2024 presidential election that led to a revolt by readers with a reported 250,000 people canceling their subscriptions within days.

According to the Journal, "The changes inside the Post have left many staffers frustrated and confused about the future, the people close to the newsroom said. Journalists across areas from politics to national security, including Ashley Parker, Michael Scherer, Tyler Pager and Hannah Allam, have defected to publications such as the New York Times, the Atlantic and ProPublica. Josh Dawsey, a political investigations and enterprise reporter, is leaving for the Journal, where he worked before the Post," adding, "National editor Philip Rucker, investigations editor Peter Wallsten and senior national investigations editor Rosalind Helderman are in the latest batch of newsroom leaders taking calls from other publications."

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/bezos-washington-post/

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeff Bezos' WaPo reeling from losses and 'internal drama' as Trump returns to DC: report (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 20 hrs ago OP
Someone needs to tell Mr. Big Shot Bezos that Magats don't read. Joinfortmill 20 hrs ago #1
And somebody had better tell the reporters that "defecting to the NYT" Bluetus 20 hrs ago #4
Right Roy Rolling 19 hrs ago #12
Staffers still need a paycheck Blue_Tires 4 hrs ago #37
He couldn't care less. This is all about winning billions in g'ment contracts. jvill 17 hrs ago #23
S100 million loss in a year? speak easy 14 hrs ago #25
No. It was obviously the plan all along. How to destroy a free press in just a few short years. ratchiweenie 10 hrs ago #26
nonsense speak easy 9 hrs ago #27
Not when you have more than you can spend in 100dreds of lifetimes. He could care less. By destroying a free press ratchiweenie 9 hrs ago #28
I tend to agree with you. yardwork 5 hrs ago #34
It's not really a newspaper any more Marthe48 20 hrs ago #2
Look at the formula for articles. That explains everything. Bluetus 20 hrs ago #6
Yep...the first paragraph should contain the who, what, when, where, and why. Details in the following paragraphs. SeattleVet 18 hrs ago #17
The point is, they are in the clickbait business now, not the journalism business. Bluetus 18 hrs ago #19
They pointedly DON'T give the facts up front anymore FakeNoose 6 hrs ago #30
I thought that my attention span... skypilot 18 hrs ago #18
The billionaires seem hell bent on destroying the free press. Irish_Dem 20 hrs ago #3
Usually after a plague, we go through a period of enlightenment. Initech 17 hrs ago #22
This IS the plague 0rganism 4 hrs ago #36
The thing about these billionaires that climb to that level of wealth dgauss 20 hrs ago #5
Good. Scrivener7 20 hrs ago #7
Maybe he can reduce the $600m wedding budget by 90% to offset the loss. live love laugh 19 hrs ago #8
If he were to lose Katcat 19 hrs ago #13
Dumped my Wapo subscription and my Amazon Prime. paleotn 19 hrs ago #9
My two cents Roy Rolling 19 hrs ago #10
I feel for those left behind at WaPo RainCaster 19 hrs ago #11
Nobody is "reeling" slumcamper 19 hrs ago #14
Note to Bezos Bozvotros 18 hrs ago #15
Sorry, dude, you ruined it Lulu KC 18 hrs ago #16
Sigh we are back in an extreme robber baron age I'm afraid. cstanleytech 18 hrs ago #20
He bought it to destroy it. Initech 17 hrs ago #21
If the report is accurate, the arrogant bezos brought this on himself, and I salute all those journalists who had the JohnSJ 14 hrs ago #24
I was particularly upset Danascot 7 hrs ago #29
When this happened, I BlueSky3 5 hrs ago #31
There will be more people leaving Blue_Tires 4 hrs ago #39
Jennifer Rubin is BlueSky3 5 hrs ago #32
I hate their new comments format. yardwork 5 hrs ago #35
When I canceled after the Harris debacle, I had been paying $10 a month. They offered it for $4 a month Maeve 5 hrs ago #33
Piss on Bezos Blue_Tires 4 hrs ago #38
Remember when Bezos bought WaPo in 2013, and said he wouldn't interfere with the management of the paper? FakeNoose 1 hr ago #40

Bluetus

(377 posts)
4. And somebody had better tell the reporters that "defecting to the NYT"
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 08:24 PM
20 hrs ago

Last edited Sat Jan 11, 2025, 10:38 PM - Edit history (1)

is like moving from a beef slaughterhouse to a pork slaughterhouse to protest animal cruelty.

I am sympathetic to whatever staff there is at WashPo that has what could be recognized as journalistic integrity. They don't have any good options in the legacy media, and the newer media is surely less secure than working for an outlet owned by a mega-billionaire. But moving to NYT is scarcely a way to signal that you have any journalistic integrity.

Blue_Tires

(57,208 posts)
37. Staffers still need a paycheck
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 12:37 PM
4 hrs ago

And there's nothing available at the smaller newspapers

ratchiweenie

(7,962 posts)
26. No. It was obviously the plan all along. How to destroy a free press in just a few short years.
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 07:00 AM
10 hrs ago

ratchiweenie

(7,962 posts)
28. Not when you have more than you can spend in 100dreds of lifetimes. He could care less. By destroying a free press
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 07:26 AM
9 hrs ago

these crooks stand to make so much more.

yardwork

(64,926 posts)
34. I tend to agree with you.
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 11:53 AM
5 hrs ago

Similarly, Musk doesn't care that Twitter loses money. He and Bezos have much bigger deals to make, and buying up media outlets to destroy them seems to be an acceptable cost of doing business, for them.

I'm curious to see what happens to Meta, though. That's a private company and it's the main source of Zuckerberg's wealth. He makes billions selling the data Facebook users share with him. If the users leave, Zuckerberg might feel the hit.

Marthe48

(19,581 posts)
2. It's not really a newspaper any more
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 08:12 PM
20 hrs ago

It's a hollowed out shell of the honored bastion of reporting it used to be. It took awhile, but after stripping the integrity from a robust publishing icon, bezos managed to kill it.




Bluetus

(377 posts)
6. Look at the formula for articles. That explains everything.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 08:33 PM
20 hrs ago

In classical journalism, the objective is to inform the readers with truth, as efficiently as possible. The classical form says that you put the essential story in the first paragraph. In subsequent paragraphs, you fill in details for those that have more time or interest to consume the complete story.

Look at WashPo and most of the other legacy newspapers cum online news. You will find that in >90% of the online articles, the classical form is completely reversed. It is now the clickbait model, where you start with a misleading headline. Then the first paragraph hints about something sinister, evil, sexy, or bloody, but provides no useful information. In subsequent paragraphs, you lead the viewer along, making them skip past ad after ad. Finally, in the 10th paragraph -- or maybe on the third page, they might provide some of the essential details.

Bezos didn't turn the newspaper world from journalism to clickbait -- at least not by himself. It is everywhere. But by putting WashPo on that track, he guaranteed the demise of this once proud paper.

And you know what, Bezos is OK with that. That's one less news source that could report on Amazon's abusive labor practices and destruction to local economies.

SeattleVet

(5,609 posts)
17. Yep...the first paragraph should contain the who, what, when, where, and why. Details in the following paragraphs.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 10:17 PM
18 hrs ago

You know, actual JOURNALISM, and not the scattered mess we have today.

FakeNoose

(36,163 posts)
30. They pointedly DON'T give the facts up front anymore
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 10:51 AM
6 hrs ago

If readers get the gist of the story in the first couple of paragraphs, they might skip reading the whole story. So the writers and editors bury the facts into the middle or end of the story to keep us puzzled and to keep us hooked.

It's diabolical what they're doing now.

I figure that AI will take over soon, the reporters will be fired because they expect to be paid salaries and benefits. Chatbots are less demanding and far cheaper to manage.

skypilot

(8,953 posts)
18. I thought that my attention span...
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 10:23 PM
18 hrs ago

...was waning with age. I've noticed a lot of news articles written the way you described. I find myself doing a lot of skimming or sometimes just giving up on the article in frustration.

Initech

(102,774 posts)
22. Usually after a plague, we go through a period of enlightenment.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 11:17 PM
17 hrs ago

Instead we're going ass backwards at an extremely alarming rate, all so a couple of jackass billionaires can become trillionaires. WTF.

0rganism

(24,790 posts)
36. This IS the plague
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 12:27 PM
4 hrs ago

It's a rolling wave of Stupid threatening to engulf the entire planet. When it's subsided, the survivors might get that period of enlightenment if they're still capable of cognition.

dgauss

(1,180 posts)
5. The thing about these billionaires that climb to that level of wealth
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 08:28 PM
20 hrs ago

is that they don't give a damn about what they destroy on their way up. At least that's the impression I'm getting. F these people and their exponential selfishness.

RainCaster

(11,722 posts)
11. I feel for those left behind at WaPo
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 09:35 PM
19 hrs ago

You didn't get out quick enough, and now the quality papers have filled all their openings for senior staff. Better get used to writing clickbait, or start your own quality news service with your compatriots.

slumcamper

(1,742 posts)
14. Nobody is "reeling"
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 09:40 PM
19 hrs ago

Disclaimer: I didn't bother to read the article.

Here's the deal: certain monied interest who own and controls this entity is not bothered in the least by any purported "reeling."

Notwithstanding the reeling of those journalists who would otherwise do good works, the failure of this news pillar--to its owner--is tantamount to dropping and losing a quarter in a gutter. IT DOESN'T MATTER to Bezos.

Seriously. He and his ilk are laughing as we, hair afire, lament the rapid deconstruction of institutions and practices that most of society has long relied on as pillars of our cultural landscape.

Can we forge a new landscape;? Or am I envisioning a new country? The rapidity of change coupled with the fleeting of time suggest a "rupture" in the historical continuum--and that phenomenon warrants a much different discussion.



Bozvotros

(852 posts)
15. Note to Bezos
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 10:10 PM
18 hrs ago

It's not reeling that's going on at the Washington Post. It's called circling the drain.

Lulu KC

(5,277 posts)
16. Sorry, dude, you ruined it
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 10:13 PM
18 hrs ago


The readers are the ones who lost something. You lost nothing, Bozo.

Initech

(102,774 posts)
21. He bought it to destroy it.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 11:15 PM
17 hrs ago

Fuck Jeff Bezos. If there is a hell, I hope Satan has a special circle reserved just for him.

JohnSJ

(96,894 posts)
24. If the report is accurate, the arrogant bezos brought this on himself, and I salute all those journalists who had the
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 02:33 AM
14 hrs ago

the courage to risk their careers and not be dictated to by a billionaire what not to write about.

When bezo blocked the post's presidential endorsement, I immediately cancelled my subscription to the WP, and will not even consider going back unless bezo is no long affiliated with the paper.


Danascot

(4,927 posts)
29. I was particularly upset
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 09:14 AM
7 hrs ago

when WP spiked an Ann Telnaes cartoon that depicted billionaires including Bezos bowing before trump. She quit as a result. I've been a fan of hers for years. I'd already canceled my subscription after the Post refused to endorse Kamala. If I hadn't I'd cancel over their lack of support for Telnaes. She showed us what courage looks like.

https://anntelnaes.substack.com/p/why-im-quitting-the-washington-post

BlueSky3

(722 posts)
31. When this happened, I
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 11:46 AM
5 hrs ago

immediately subscribed to her Substack. She’ll probably make more $ there than she did with the Post anyway.

Blue_Tires

(57,208 posts)
39. There will be more people leaving
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 12:42 PM
4 hrs ago

As long as Jeffrey keeps meddling with editorial content

BlueSky3

(722 posts)
32. Jennifer Rubin is
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 11:48 AM
5 hrs ago

still there. I’ll keep subscribing for her and the advice columnists like Carolyn Hax. The comments boards on the WaPo are sometimes informative as well.

yardwork

(64,926 posts)
35. I hate their new comments format.
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 11:56 AM
5 hrs ago

It's basically impossible to read now.

I like some of the columnists and articles but am thinking about unsubscribing.

Maeve

(43,076 posts)
33. When I canceled after the Harris debacle, I had been paying $10 a month. They offered it for $4 a month
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 11:51 AM
5 hrs ago

Now that is down to $2 a month for online access. Desperate times...

Blue_Tires

(57,208 posts)
38. Piss on Bezos
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 12:39 PM
4 hrs ago

He made the decision to drop his trousers and crawl under the sheets with Donnie so he might as well get comfortable 😒

FakeNoose

(36,163 posts)
40. Remember when Bezos bought WaPo in 2013, and said he wouldn't interfere with the management of the paper?
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 03:21 PM
1 hr ago

Link: https://archive.ph/45IUT

Silly me, I actually believed him ... then!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jeff Bezos' WaPo reeling ...