Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(164,713 posts)
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 08:07 PM Jan 2025

Jeff Bezos' WaPo reeling from losses and 'internal drama' as Trump returns to DC: report

Source: Raw Story

January 11, 2025 12:47PM ET


At a time when the always newsworthy Donald Trump is headed back to the White House, the venerable Washington Post should be gearing up to cover his second term but instead is being subjected to an exodus of top reporters and internal strife, reports the Wall Street Journal's Alexandra Bruell.

In her report for the Journal, Bruell notes that Amazon founder and billionaire Jeff Bezos, who bought the Post in 2013 for $250 million, just watched his investment lose around $100 million last year as new management has failed to stop the bleeding.

The Journal also reports that top-flight journalists are also fleeing to greener pastures under the management of interim executive editor Matt Murray and publisher William Lewis who has still not righted the ship since his hiring. Adding to the Post's problems was a decision to spike an endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris before the 2024 presidential election that led to a revolt by readers with a reported 250,000 people canceling their subscriptions within days.

According to the Journal, "The changes inside the Post have left many staffers frustrated and confused about the future, the people close to the newsroom said. Journalists across areas from politics to national security, including Ashley Parker, Michael Scherer, Tyler Pager and Hannah Allam, have defected to publications such as the New York Times, the Atlantic and ProPublica. Josh Dawsey, a political investigations and enterprise reporter, is leaving for the Journal, where he worked before the Post," adding, "National editor Philip Rucker, investigations editor Peter Wallsten and senior national investigations editor Rosalind Helderman are in the latest batch of newsroom leaders taking calls from other publications."

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/bezos-washington-post/

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeff Bezos' WaPo reeling from losses and 'internal drama' as Trump returns to DC: report (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 OP
Someone needs to tell Mr. Big Shot Bezos that Magats don't read. Joinfortmill Jan 2025 #1
And somebody had better tell the reporters that "defecting to the NYT" Bluetus Jan 2025 #4
Right Roy Rolling Jan 2025 #12
Staffers still need a paycheck Blue_Tires Jan 2025 #37
He couldn't care less. This is all about winning billions in g'ment contracts. jvill Jan 2025 #23
S100 million loss in a year? speak easy Jan 2025 #25
No. It was obviously the plan all along. How to destroy a free press in just a few short years. ratchiweenie Jan 2025 #26
nonsense speak easy Jan 2025 #27
Not when you have more than you can spend in 100dreds of lifetimes. He could care less. By destroying a free press ratchiweenie Jan 2025 #28
I tend to agree with you. yardwork Jan 2025 #34
It's not really a newspaper any more Marthe48 Jan 2025 #2
Look at the formula for articles. That explains everything. Bluetus Jan 2025 #6
Yep...the first paragraph should contain the who, what, when, where, and why. Details in the following paragraphs. SeattleVet Jan 2025 #17
The point is, they are in the clickbait business now, not the journalism business. Bluetus Jan 2025 #19
They pointedly DON'T give the facts up front anymore FakeNoose Jan 2025 #30
I thought that my attention span... skypilot Jan 2025 #18
The billionaires seem hell bent on destroying the free press. Irish_Dem Jan 2025 #3
Usually after a plague, we go through a period of enlightenment. Initech Jan 2025 #22
This IS the plague 0rganism Jan 2025 #36
The thing about these billionaires that climb to that level of wealth dgauss Jan 2025 #5
Good. Scrivener7 Jan 2025 #7
Maybe he can reduce the $600m wedding budget by 90% to offset the loss. live love laugh Jan 2025 #8
If he were to lose Katcat Jan 2025 #13
Dumped my Wapo subscription and my Amazon Prime. paleotn Jan 2025 #9
My two cents Roy Rolling Jan 2025 #10
I feel for those left behind at WaPo RainCaster Jan 2025 #11
Nobody is "reeling" slumcamper Jan 2025 #14
Note to Bezos Bozvotros Jan 2025 #15
Sorry, dude, you ruined it Lulu KC Jan 2025 #16
You bought it, you broke it? dickthegrouch Jan 2025 #43
Sigh we are back in an extreme robber baron age I'm afraid. cstanleytech Jan 2025 #20
He bought it to destroy it. Initech Jan 2025 #21
If the report is accurate, the arrogant bezos brought this on himself, and I salute all those journalists who had the JohnSJ Jan 2025 #24
I was particularly upset Danascot Jan 2025 #29
When this happened, I BlueSky3 Jan 2025 #31
Thanks for reminding me I could do that. Danascot Jan 2025 #41
There will be more people leaving Blue_Tires Jan 2025 #39
Indeed ck4829 Jan 2025 #46
Jennifer Rubin is BlueSky3 Jan 2025 #32
I hate their new comments format. yardwork Jan 2025 #35
Yes, the new BlueSky3 Jan 2025 #42
I just unsubscribed from WaPo and subscribed to The Contrarian on Substack. yardwork Jan 2025 #44
When I canceled after the Harris debacle, I had been paying $10 a month. They offered it for $4 a month Maeve Jan 2025 #33
Piss on Bezos Blue_Tires Jan 2025 #38
Remember when Bezos bought WaPo in 2013, and said he wouldn't interfere with the management of the paper? FakeNoose Jan 2025 #40
Jeffy couldn't get his rocket up either tonekat Jan 2025 #45

Bluetus

(2,106 posts)
4. And somebody had better tell the reporters that "defecting to the NYT"
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 08:24 PM
Jan 2025

Last edited Sat Jan 11, 2025, 10:38 PM - Edit history (1)

is like moving from a beef slaughterhouse to a pork slaughterhouse to protest animal cruelty.

I am sympathetic to whatever staff there is at WashPo that has what could be recognized as journalistic integrity. They don't have any good options in the legacy media, and the newer media is surely less secure than working for an outlet owned by a mega-billionaire. But moving to NYT is scarcely a way to signal that you have any journalistic integrity.

 

Blue_Tires

(57,596 posts)
37. Staffers still need a paycheck
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 12:37 PM
Jan 2025

And there's nothing available at the smaller newspapers

ratchiweenie

(8,149 posts)
26. No. It was obviously the plan all along. How to destroy a free press in just a few short years.
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 07:00 AM
Jan 2025

ratchiweenie

(8,149 posts)
28. Not when you have more than you can spend in 100dreds of lifetimes. He could care less. By destroying a free press
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 07:26 AM
Jan 2025

these crooks stand to make so much more.

yardwork

(68,817 posts)
34. I tend to agree with you.
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 11:53 AM
Jan 2025

Similarly, Musk doesn't care that Twitter loses money. He and Bezos have much bigger deals to make, and buying up media outlets to destroy them seems to be an acceptable cost of doing business, for them.

I'm curious to see what happens to Meta, though. That's a private company and it's the main source of Zuckerberg's wealth. He makes billions selling the data Facebook users share with him. If the users leave, Zuckerberg might feel the hit.

Marthe48

(22,562 posts)
2. It's not really a newspaper any more
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 08:12 PM
Jan 2025

It's a hollowed out shell of the honored bastion of reporting it used to be. It took awhile, but after stripping the integrity from a robust publishing icon, bezos managed to kill it.




Bluetus

(2,106 posts)
6. Look at the formula for articles. That explains everything.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 08:33 PM
Jan 2025

In classical journalism, the objective is to inform the readers with truth, as efficiently as possible. The classical form says that you put the essential story in the first paragraph. In subsequent paragraphs, you fill in details for those that have more time or interest to consume the complete story.

Look at WashPo and most of the other legacy newspapers cum online news. You will find that in >90% of the online articles, the classical form is completely reversed. It is now the clickbait model, where you start with a misleading headline. Then the first paragraph hints about something sinister, evil, sexy, or bloody, but provides no useful information. In subsequent paragraphs, you lead the viewer along, making them skip past ad after ad. Finally, in the 10th paragraph -- or maybe on the third page, they might provide some of the essential details.

Bezos didn't turn the newspaper world from journalism to clickbait -- at least not by himself. It is everywhere. But by putting WashPo on that track, he guaranteed the demise of this once proud paper.

And you know what, Bezos is OK with that. That's one less news source that could report on Amazon's abusive labor practices and destruction to local economies.

SeattleVet

(5,806 posts)
17. Yep...the first paragraph should contain the who, what, when, where, and why. Details in the following paragraphs.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 10:17 PM
Jan 2025

You know, actual JOURNALISM, and not the scattered mess we have today.

FakeNoose

(39,853 posts)
30. They pointedly DON'T give the facts up front anymore
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 10:51 AM
Jan 2025

If readers get the gist of the story in the first couple of paragraphs, they might skip reading the whole story. So the writers and editors bury the facts into the middle or end of the story to keep us puzzled and to keep us hooked.

It's diabolical what they're doing now.

I figure that AI will take over soon, the reporters will be fired because they expect to be paid salaries and benefits. Chatbots are less demanding and far cheaper to manage.

skypilot

(9,089 posts)
18. I thought that my attention span...
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 10:23 PM
Jan 2025

...was waning with age. I've noticed a lot of news articles written the way you described. I find myself doing a lot of skimming or sometimes just giving up on the article in frustration.

Initech

(107,134 posts)
22. Usually after a plague, we go through a period of enlightenment.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 11:17 PM
Jan 2025

Instead we're going ass backwards at an extremely alarming rate, all so a couple of jackass billionaires can become trillionaires. WTF.

0rganism

(25,447 posts)
36. This IS the plague
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 12:27 PM
Jan 2025

It's a rolling wave of Stupid threatening to engulf the entire planet. When it's subsided, the survivors might get that period of enlightenment if they're still capable of cognition.

dgauss

(1,481 posts)
5. The thing about these billionaires that climb to that level of wealth
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 08:28 PM
Jan 2025

is that they don't give a damn about what they destroy on their way up. At least that's the impression I'm getting. F these people and their exponential selfishness.

RainCaster

(13,355 posts)
11. I feel for those left behind at WaPo
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 09:35 PM
Jan 2025

You didn't get out quick enough, and now the quality papers have filled all their openings for senior staff. Better get used to writing clickbait, or start your own quality news service with your compatriots.

slumcamper

(1,776 posts)
14. Nobody is "reeling"
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 09:40 PM
Jan 2025

Disclaimer: I didn't bother to read the article.

Here's the deal: certain monied interest who own and controls this entity is not bothered in the least by any purported "reeling."

Notwithstanding the reeling of those journalists who would otherwise do good works, the failure of this news pillar--to its owner--is tantamount to dropping and losing a quarter in a gutter. IT DOESN'T MATTER to Bezos.

Seriously. He and his ilk are laughing as we, hair afire, lament the rapid deconstruction of institutions and practices that most of society has long relied on as pillars of our cultural landscape.

Can we forge a new landscape;? Or am I envisioning a new country? The rapidity of change coupled with the fleeting of time suggest a "rupture" in the historical continuum--and that phenomenon warrants a much different discussion.



Bozvotros

(951 posts)
15. Note to Bezos
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 10:10 PM
Jan 2025

It's not reeling that's going on at the Washington Post. It's called circling the drain.

Lulu KC

(8,406 posts)
16. Sorry, dude, you ruined it
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 10:13 PM
Jan 2025


The readers are the ones who lost something. You lost nothing, Bozo.

Initech

(107,134 posts)
21. He bought it to destroy it.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 11:15 PM
Jan 2025

Fuck Jeff Bezos. If there is a hell, I hope Satan has a special circle reserved just for him.

 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
24. If the report is accurate, the arrogant bezos brought this on himself, and I salute all those journalists who had the
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 02:33 AM
Jan 2025

the courage to risk their careers and not be dictated to by a billionaire what not to write about.

When bezo blocked the post's presidential endorsement, I immediately cancelled my subscription to the WP, and will not even consider going back unless bezo is no long affiliated with the paper.


Danascot

(5,155 posts)
29. I was particularly upset
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 09:14 AM
Jan 2025

when WP spiked an Ann Telnaes cartoon that depicted billionaires including Bezos bowing before trump. She quit as a result. I've been a fan of hers for years. I'd already canceled my subscription after the Post refused to endorse Kamala. If I hadn't I'd cancel over their lack of support for Telnaes. She showed us what courage looks like.

https://anntelnaes.substack.com/p/why-im-quitting-the-washington-post

BlueSky3

(733 posts)
31. When this happened, I
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 11:46 AM
Jan 2025

immediately subscribed to her Substack. She’ll probably make more $ there than she did with the Post anyway.

Danascot

(5,155 posts)
41. Thanks for reminding me I could do that.
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 05:10 PM
Jan 2025

I hope she 'makes more $ there than she did with the Post'.

 

Blue_Tires

(57,596 posts)
39. There will be more people leaving
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 12:42 PM
Jan 2025

As long as Jeffrey keeps meddling with editorial content

BlueSky3

(733 posts)
32. Jennifer Rubin is
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 11:48 AM
Jan 2025

still there. I’ll keep subscribing for her and the advice columnists like Carolyn Hax. The comments boards on the WaPo are sometimes informative as well.

yardwork

(68,817 posts)
35. I hate their new comments format.
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 11:56 AM
Jan 2025

It's basically impossible to read now.

I like some of the columnists and articles but am thinking about unsubscribing.

BlueSky3

(733 posts)
42. Yes, the new
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 06:46 PM
Jan 2025

comments format is awful. For a while I would click all four of the buttons below posts just to mess with them, but now they only let you click on one.

Maeve

(43,325 posts)
33. When I canceled after the Harris debacle, I had been paying $10 a month. They offered it for $4 a month
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 11:51 AM
Jan 2025

Now that is down to $2 a month for online access. Desperate times...

 

Blue_Tires

(57,596 posts)
38. Piss on Bezos
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 12:39 PM
Jan 2025

He made the decision to drop his trousers and crawl under the sheets with Donnie so he might as well get comfortable 😒

FakeNoose

(39,853 posts)
40. Remember when Bezos bought WaPo in 2013, and said he wouldn't interfere with the management of the paper?
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 03:21 PM
Jan 2025

Link: https://archive.ph/45IUT

Silly me, I actually believed him ... then!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jeff Bezos' WaPo reeling ...