Latest Breaking News

OldBaldy1701E

(6,799 posts)

40. Which makes us 'Public Enemy Number One' I am afraid.

Mon Dec 23, 2024, 06:34 AM

Dec 23

No one employs hate more that the US. We hate anything that is not like us and that is not based in greedy capitalism. Hell, there are successful industries that are solely based on hate. They thrive here.

Being magnanimous is seen as a fault here (unless it gains one something). Being compassionate and understanding is also something seen as 'weak'. Hate seems to be the one thing we can all agree on (either as a useful tool or a destructive force, we still agree that it is something to keep in our society).

Freaking sad, isn't it?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

twodogsbarking

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump and allies are waging campaign against media to stifle dissent - experts [View all] BumRushDaShow Dec 21 OP

Don't tell the truth about me BOSSHOG Dec 21 #1

We'll find out pretty quickly with media has balls and those that do not. NotHardly Dec 22 #39

"...designed to stifle dissent and potentially put them out of business." J_William_Ryan Dec 21 #2

I was gonna say DENVERPOPS Dec 22 #13

"From day one...." NotHardly Dec 22 #18

The USA media is all in with the it.... Lovie777 Dec 21 #3

The MSM self-desisted 20 fucking years ago. Magoo48 Dec 22 #23

Self- what?? ificandream Dec 22 #25

What's wrong with self-desisted? Magoo48 Dec 22 #30

Self-desisted isn't a word, that's what. ificandream Dec 22 #31

I like self-desisted. This is American English we speak. I can make up words if I want. Magoo48 Dec 22 #34

No. ificandream Dec 22 #35

A bit of a rude grammarsnob too are we? Magoo48 Dec 22 #36

From my career in the media. So, yes. ificandream Dec 22 #38

Good effing grief .... they definitely are not. ificandream Dec 22 #24

They can't stifle, control, or intimidate non-American corporate media no_hypocrisy Dec 21 #4

they'll try. there can be selective economic and access actions against any outlets. erronis Dec 21 #6

So counter sue the c...p out of them. mwmisses4289 Dec 21 #5

We'll just do the Gish Gallup of dissent like no one has ever seen before, frankly.* RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Dec 21 #7

"Freedom of the Press? Who needs that?" - Trump's cult, probably sakabatou Dec 21 #8

That's Trump's biggest enemy. ificandream Dec 22 #26

Aren't SLAPP suits illegal? JoseBalow Dec 21 #9

Commercial Media Roy Rolling Dec 21 #10

No, they're not slaves. Not even close. ificandream Dec 22 #27

If Trump is filing frivolous lawsuits, he should be responsible for legal fees. JohnnyRingo Dec 21 #11

Trump is the quintesssential vexatious litigant. Bo Zarts Dec 22 #20

We cannot let trump be successful at controlling the media. oldmanlynn Dec 22 #12

For the most part DENVERPOPS Dec 22 #14

Who told you that? The answer is they don't. ificandream Dec 22 #28

The billionaire owners already control it. Manipulated, censored, and invented on command. Magoo48 Dec 22 #32

And after they put all that effort into sane washing him too! perdita9 Dec 22 #15

The greatest threat to the world, hate. twodogsbarking Dec 22 #16

Which makes us 'Public Enemy Number One' I am afraid. OldBaldy1701E Dec 23 #40

It is often disguised to be somehing else. Peace to you. twodogsbarking Dec 23 #42

Counter sue with damages.... Dem4life1970 Dec 22 #17

Here are two wonderful books to understand what the maga are doing and have been doing since Nixon........... turbinetree Dec 22 #19

The WaPo has hobbled it's comments tonekat Dec 22 #21

HE, and the republican enablers, ARE THE MEDIA'S FAULT! BComplex Dec 22 #22

Dictator 101. Buckle up. Evolve Dammit Dec 22 #29

No Free Press? Kid Berwyn Dec 22 #33

"...and potentially put them out of business." Unladen Swallow Dec 22 #37

If/when he loses these suits for failure to prove loss, harm, or damage, can't he be made to pay the defense's costs? ancianita Dec 23 #41