Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hamsterjill

(18,060 posts)
34. Thank you.
Thu Jul 9, 2026, 01:35 PM
11 hrs ago

It is readily apparent in my neck of the woods - South Texas. More and more young women are choosing to be stay-at-home moms and have sometimes six and seven kids. Many choose to homeschool, which I am NOT a fan of. Many have a little side hustle in the home baking cookies or something. That works for about six months, and then they realize it's not all lollipops and rainbows and they aren't making the money they thought they were going to make. Because every other woman is doing the same damn thing!

All of that is their choice. Granted.

But it is a BAD choice.

One of the most notable things is that these women, while unemployed, are not paying into social security even. Much less a retirement account. So unless the dominant male is going to work and put away millions, how in the heck will they ever be able to retire? I realize most aren't thinking about retirement. But it gets here faster than anyone expects. I guess if you have six or seven kids, you expect that they will take care of you in your older years. Bet that's what Jim and Michelle Duggar were thinking at one point, and look how things have turned out for them. LOL The young women in South Texas don't have a reality show with residuals either.

These young people don't contemplate that one spouse might get sick. One might die. One might decide to leave. Most likely the husband who has more contact with the outside world and isn't tired and distraught after a long day of feeding, bathing and teaching a bunch of kids. Then where would the entire family be? The woman with no work experience will be standing in line trying to get the aid that they before so loudly insisted shouldn't be available.

Again, just a bad idea. It's history repeating itself trying to make women dependent on men. It's bullshit.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Emma Waters is listed as a contributor to the Project 2025 manifesto for destroying democracy. Lonestarblue 13 hrs ago #1
They also want to get rid of no fault divorce Diraven 12 hrs ago #23
This is all the beginning of taking away the 19th amendment. sagetea 13 hrs ago #2
True. But it will never happen. Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #22
Oh, I agree! sagetea 11 hrs ago #29
"White House Assesses Ways to Persuade White Women to Have More Children," Ray Bruns 13 hrs ago #3
Exactly. What white bigots fear most is becoming the minority William Seger 13 hrs ago #5
There's a fertilitiy crisis now? WTF. Initech 13 hrs ago #4
(r) incels wonder why their hands don't get pregnant. erronis 13 hrs ago #8
Well when you spend all day inside, watching porn and talking shit about women on podcasts... Initech 13 hrs ago #10
Fertility Crisis. Wednesdays 12 hrs ago #12
Read the novel and you'll understand WHY there was a fertility crisis jmowreader 12 hrs ago #27
That's what struck me BaronChocula 12 hrs ago #28
My feeling is that men can take the trad wife crap and shove it you know where Stargazer99 13 hrs ago #6
These idgit men claim they want a "trad" wife, mwmisses4289 12 hrs ago #16
Ridiculous moose65 13 hrs ago #7
"... believe they're on a reality show." playing to that orange corpustulence. erronis 13 hrs ago #9
"White House Assesses Ways to Persuade Women to Have More WHITE Children" Wednesdays 12 hrs ago #11
Charting menstrual cycles? mcar 12 hrs ago #13
Women are having fewer children because it cost so much to raise a child to 18 yrs of age. patphil 12 hrs ago #14
NYT loves to publish Liberal Nightmare Fuel. maxsolomon 12 hrs ago #15
Here's how she really looks, before AI fixed her up FakeNoose 12 hrs ago #17
Stephen Miller's wife in 10 years. rubbersole 12 hrs ago #19
Why are they giving her a platform. chowder66 12 hrs ago #18
Really???????? BurnDoubt 12 hrs ago #20
There is no fertility crisis. The earth is still way overpopulated. hamsterjill 12 hrs ago #21
Exactly what the REPUBLICNS want! some_of_us_are_sane 12 hrs ago #25
Thank you. hamsterjill 11 hrs ago #34
Well said! NNadir 12 hrs ago #26
Thank you. hamsterjill 11 hrs ago #31
I might add that the current regime's policies have led to a significant decrease in affordable health care. How does Martin68 12 hrs ago #24
Links to NYT article TommyT139 11 hrs ago #30
"endometriosis" WILL KILL YOU -- that is, it will kill women AverageOldGuy 11 hrs ago #32
That's another "woman's problem". Something the Project 2025 authors don't care about. erronis 9 hrs ago #36
A young woman i know (mid twenties) had endometriosis so bad that she had to have a hysterectomy. mwmisses4289 4 hrs ago #38
I'm so glad for your friend. erronis 3 hrs ago #39
They must have hit the "hideous her up" button on their AI thingy jmowreader 11 hrs ago #33
To say nothing about that "godly man" probably having multiple other partners, even marriages. erronis 9 hrs ago #37
The GOP needs more little kids to diddle Blue Owl 11 hrs ago #35
This article is a slap in the face to women for multiple reasons dlk 3 hrs ago #40
Objectification. Turning women into objects. erronis 2 hrs ago #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The New York Times Would ...»Reply #34