General Discussion

OldBaldy1701E

(11,794 posts)

44. Simple.

Thu Jun 25, 2026, 07:39 AM

21 hrs ago

What is the point of this?

Money. They only care about income. Which is no different than anyone else in this country. They know where their salaries are coming from, and it isn't from the average reader. It is from the wealthy owners who will not interfere with either the unrestrained capitalism that is destroying the country, or the racism and classism that create the ability to 'make bank' with their stories and coverage.

And what are they afraid of?

Losing that same income from the big donors. They know where it is coming from and they are not going to risk losing it.

They can also see that we are not going to do anything to endanger their model anyway. So, they get to be what they are, and we get to sit and let them.

'Murica!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I cannot get this NYT article out of my mind. It's everything that's wrong with the media today. [View all] Scrivener7 Wednesday OP

I had the same reaction, Scrivener choie Wednesday #1

Excellently phrased!!! n/t returnee Wednesday #2

Thank you! Scrivener7 Wednesday #4

They aren't stupid. Wednesdays Wednesday #3

I agree. But I'm beginning to think it is going to backfire on them. They're doing it to Scrivener7 Wednesday #5

Media are owned by oligarchs. usonian Wednesday #6

Yes, but to what end? What is the advantage to them of making the media too stupid to pay any attention to? Scrivener7 Wednesday #27

You answered your own question... ColoradoHoosier 20 hrs ago #45

Oh. That's awful. But it fits. Scrivener7 19 hrs ago #46

I watch ABC Nightly News ( which has lately become the ABC Nightly Weather Channel for some reason) Ray Bruns Wednesday #7

There is a flip side here. Trump is an attention hog. By not talking about him you undermine his relevancy. flashman13 Wednesday #10

There's a paradox relogic Wednesday #13

I agree that there is a paradox here, but I think there is a work around. What needs to happen is to focus flashman13 Wednesday #23

The solution is to give him the coverage he's earned BaronChocula Wednesday #25

Yes. Why any outlet pays a White House correspondent under this regime is beyond me. Scrivener7 Wednesday #28

My husband and I predict the lead story: Tornadoes/weather, airplanes falling out of sky/colliding, shootings, Trump. betsuni Wednesday #11

This is a great headline. I approve of their approach. reACTIONary Wednesday #8

Seriously, I'm asking. Tell me why. Because I just don't understand. Scrivener7 Wednesday #29

For several reasons, and with one exception.... reACTIONary Wednesday #30

I hear you. And thank you for taking the time. But I'm still going to disagree. Scrivener7 Wednesday #32

Personally, I think investigating the claim is better... reACTIONary Wednesday #33

We disagree, but I do appreciate the conversation. Be well. Scrivener7 Wednesday #35

You also!!! reACTIONary Wednesday #36

Because it's made you forget about Epstein questionseverything Wednesday #37

Not me! Scrivener7 Wednesday #38

Well yes, they DO know, but they keep dancing around it FakeNoose Wednesday #9

The media dance the bumbling two-step as well as trump. erronis Wednesday #12

One could argue that the NYT is already useless and basically preaching to the choir. maxsolomon Wednesday #14

Seriously.......... popsdenver Wednesday #15

You.. homegirl Wednesday #17

(NOT!)newsmax is even more propaganda driven than fuxnews. yellow dahlia Wednesday #18

Sorry, but people vastly overestimate the number of people who watch Fox News Wiz Imp Wednesday #22

Thanks! Those are interesting numbers! reACTIONary Wednesday #34

"which went into his cronies' pockets,"...And most probably into his, or his family's pockets. Escurumbele Wednesday #16

The tragedy that people need to understand is the fact that to cover his grift and stupity, Escurumbele Wednesday #19

Right! Raise doubts? yellow dahlia Wednesday #20

Every night from 1979 to 1981 BidenRocks Wednesday #21

They're smart people. They know what they're doing. Politicub Wednesday #24

;-{) THIS Goonch Wednesday #26

Now they cater to the few Magats reading their crap mdbl Wednesday #31

They probably couldn't afford to send a real reporter so they paid Maggie to write something that would not cause Trump 3Hotdogs Wednesday #39

"Being useless" is, in fact, useful to some. hay rick Wednesday #40

So your problem is evidence? iemanja Wednesday #41

Do you really need to read about those internal documents to Scrivener7 22 hrs ago #43

I misplaced my response iemanja 2 hrs ago #48

Journalists require evidence iemanja 2 hrs ago #47

For many years, I used to believe that journalism should present facts and let the reader decide. SouthBayDem Yesterday #42

Simple. OldBaldy1701E 21 hrs ago #44