General Discussion

popsdenver

(2,792 posts)

15. Seriously..........

Wed Jun 24, 2026, 12:28 PM

20 hrs ago

Does anyone on DU actually think for a New York second, that ANY MAGAot Trumphumper watches anything on ABC, NBC, CBS, etc.
They all have nothing on their TV's except FOX NEWS, 24/7/365 for over 20? years now........Oh, and of course RW Radio saturating the air waves across the entire, vastness of Rural America...........

And all these MAGAot voters either can't read at all, or won't read anything in print........

Rush Limbaugh is smiling and laughing hysterically from his grave.......

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

homegirl yellow dahlia Skittles Seinan Sensei

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I cannot get this NYT article out of my mind. It's everything that's wrong with the media today. [View all] Scrivener7 22 hrs ago OP

I had the same reaction, Scrivener choie 22 hrs ago #1

Excellently phrased!!! n/t returnee 21 hrs ago #2

Thank you! Scrivener7 21 hrs ago #4

They aren't stupid. Wednesdays 21 hrs ago #3

I agree. But I'm beginning to think it is going to backfire on them. They're doing it to Scrivener7 21 hrs ago #5

Media are owned by oligarchs. usonian 21 hrs ago #6

Yes, but to what end? What is the advantage to them of making the media too stupid to pay any attention to? Scrivener7 18 hrs ago #27

I watch ABC Nightly News ( which has lately become the ABC Nightly Weather Channel for some reason) Ray Bruns 21 hrs ago #7

There is a flip side here. Trump is an attention hog. By not talking about him you undermine his relevancy. flashman13 21 hrs ago #10

There's a paradox relogic 20 hrs ago #13

I agree that there is a paradox here, but I think there is a work around. What needs to happen is to focus flashman13 19 hrs ago #23

The solution is to give him the coverage he's earned BaronChocula 19 hrs ago #25

Yes. Why any outlet pays a White House correspondent under this regime is beyond me. Scrivener7 18 hrs ago #28

My husband and I predict the lead story: Tornadoes/weather, airplanes falling out of sky/colliding, shootings, Trump. betsuni 20 hrs ago #11

This is a great headline. I approve of their approach. reACTIONary 21 hrs ago #8

Seriously, I'm asking. Tell me why. Because I just don't understand. Scrivener7 18 hrs ago #29

For several reasons, and with one exception.... reACTIONary 17 hrs ago #30

I hear you. And thank you for taking the time. But I'm still going to disagree. Scrivener7 16 hrs ago #32

Personally, I think investigating the claim is better... reACTIONary 15 hrs ago #33

We disagree, but I do appreciate the conversation. Be well. Scrivener7 14 hrs ago #35

You also!!! reACTIONary 14 hrs ago #36

Because it's made you forget about Epstein questionseverything 13 hrs ago #37

Not me! Scrivener7 13 hrs ago #38

Well yes, they DO know, but they keep dancing around it FakeNoose 21 hrs ago #9

The media dance the bumbling two-step as well as trump. erronis 20 hrs ago #12

One could argue that the NYT is already useless and basically preaching to the choir. maxsolomon 20 hrs ago #14

Seriously.......... popsdenver 20 hrs ago #15

You.. homegirl 19 hrs ago #17

(NOT!)newsmax is even more propaganda driven than fuxnews. yellow dahlia 19 hrs ago #18

Sorry, but people vastly overestimate the number of people who watch Fox News Wiz Imp 19 hrs ago #22

Thanks! Those are interesting numbers! reACTIONary 15 hrs ago #34

"which went into his cronies' pockets,"...And most probably into his, or his family's pockets. Escurumbele 19 hrs ago #16

The tragedy that people need to understand is the fact that to cover his grift and stupity, Escurumbele 19 hrs ago #19

Right! Raise doubts? yellow dahlia 19 hrs ago #20

Every night from 1979 to 1981 BidenRocks 19 hrs ago #21

They're smart people. They know what they're doing. Politicub 19 hrs ago #24

;-{) THIS Goonch 19 hrs ago #26

Now they cater to the few Magats reading their crap mdbl 16 hrs ago #31

They probably couldn't afford to send a real reporter so they paid Maggie to write something that would not cause Trump 3Hotdogs 13 hrs ago #39

"Being useless" is, in fact, useful to some. hay rick 11 hrs ago #40

So your problem is evidence? iemanja 9 hrs ago #41

Do you really need to read about those internal documents to Scrivener7 1 hr ago #43

For many years, I used to believe that journalism should present facts and let the reader decide. SouthBayDem 7 hrs ago #42

Simple. OldBaldy1701E 55 min ago #44