Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Scrivener7

(60,348 posts)
Wed Jun 24, 2026, 10:09 AM 15 hrs ago

I cannot get this NYT article out of my mind. It's everything that's wrong with the media today. [View all]

It was posted by DUer hookaleft here: https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=21325477
and hookaleft linked the article: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/23/us/trump-reflecting-pool-green-peeling.html

Here is the "Emperor's New Clothes" headline: Trump Blames Vandals for Reflecting Pool Problems. Internal Records Tell Another Story.

Does the New York Times REALLY need "internal documents" to prove there are no marauding Antifa pool slasher gangs roaming the Capitol? Are they REALLY that stupid?

They know what the lede is. The lede is that a demented madman has created YET ANOTHER stupendous fuck-up which has cost us millions which went into his cronies' pockets, yet again, and for which he is refusing to take responsibility. THEY KNOW THIS.

But they insist on this kabuki dance of "We are looking at both sides, but the internal documents really do seem to suggest, maybe, possibly, that there are no marauding Antifa pool slasher gangs and the pool was just done wrong. But arrests have been made!1!!"

Everything the legacy media does takes this form. Take the lie, normalize it, both-sides it, thus creating a completely INSANE conversation. "Trump Says Iran War is Over." That headline ran 33 times! THIRTY THREE! And instead of making the thirty two previous lies the point of the article, they gave his mouth dribbles their customary wide-eyed acceptance. Thirty three times.

What is the point of this? And what are they afraid of?

Why are they so eager to make themselves useless?

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I had the same reaction, Scrivener choie 15 hrs ago #1
Excellently phrased!!! n/t returnee 15 hrs ago #2
Thank you! Scrivener7 15 hrs ago #4
They aren't stupid. Wednesdays 15 hrs ago #3
I agree. But I'm beginning to think it is going to backfire on them. They're doing it to Scrivener7 15 hrs ago #5
Media are owned by oligarchs. usonian 14 hrs ago #6
Yes, but to what end? What is the advantage to them of making the media too stupid to pay any attention to? Scrivener7 12 hrs ago #27
I watch ABC Nightly News ( which has lately become the ABC Nightly Weather Channel for some reason) Ray Bruns 14 hrs ago #7
There is a flip side here. Trump is an attention hog. By not talking about him you undermine his relevancy. flashman13 14 hrs ago #10
There's a paradox relogic 14 hrs ago #13
I agree that there is a paradox here, but I think there is a work around. What needs to happen is to focus flashman13 13 hrs ago #23
The solution is to give him the coverage he's earned BaronChocula 12 hrs ago #25
Yes. Why any outlet pays a White House correspondent under this regime is beyond me. Scrivener7 12 hrs ago #28
My husband and I predict the lead story: Tornadoes/weather, airplanes falling out of sky/colliding, shootings, Trump. betsuni 14 hrs ago #11
This is a great headline. I approve of their approach. reACTIONary 14 hrs ago #8
Seriously, I'm asking. Tell me why. Because I just don't understand. Scrivener7 12 hrs ago #29
For several reasons, and with one exception.... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #30
I hear you. And thank you for taking the time. But I'm still going to disagree. Scrivener7 9 hrs ago #32
Personally, I think investigating the claim is better... reACTIONary 8 hrs ago #33
We disagree, but I do appreciate the conversation. Be well. Scrivener7 8 hrs ago #35
You also!!! reACTIONary 8 hrs ago #36
Because it's made you forget about Epstein questionseverything 7 hrs ago #37
Not me! Scrivener7 7 hrs ago #38
Well yes, they DO know, but they keep dancing around it FakeNoose 14 hrs ago #9
The media dance the bumbling two-step as well as trump. erronis 14 hrs ago #12
One could argue that the NYT is already useless and basically preaching to the choir. maxsolomon 14 hrs ago #14
Seriously.......... popsdenver 13 hrs ago #15
You.. homegirl 13 hrs ago #17
(NOT!)newsmax is even more propaganda driven than fuxnews. yellow dahlia 13 hrs ago #18
Sorry, but people vastly overestimate the number of people who watch Fox News Wiz Imp 13 hrs ago #22
Thanks! Those are interesting numbers! reACTIONary 8 hrs ago #34
"which went into his cronies' pockets,"...And most probably into his, or his family's pockets. Escurumbele 13 hrs ago #16
The tragedy that people need to understand is the fact that to cover his grift and stupity, Escurumbele 13 hrs ago #19
Right! Raise doubts? yellow dahlia 13 hrs ago #20
Every night from 1979 to 1981 BidenRocks 13 hrs ago #21
They're smart people. They know what they're doing. Politicub 13 hrs ago #24
;-{) THIS Goonch 12 hrs ago #26
Now they cater to the few Magats reading their crap mdbl 9 hrs ago #31
They probably couldn't afford to send a real reporter so they paid Maggie to write something that would not cause Trump 3Hotdogs 6 hrs ago #39
"Being useless" is, in fact, useful to some. hay rick 4 hrs ago #40
So your problem is evidence? iemanja 2 hrs ago #41
For many years, I used to believe that journalism should present facts and let the reader decide. SouthBayDem 39 min ago #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I cannot get this NYT art...