Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

LetMyPeopleVote

(182,843 posts)
Thu May 28, 2026, 04:13 PM Thursday

MaddowBlog-Republicans keep trying (and failing) to find people worthy of 'slush fund' payouts [View all]

The more the party struggles to identify legitimate “victims” worthy of our money, the more it proves the opposite of the GOP’s intended point.

Who should get payouts from Trump’s slush fund? Republicans have specifically pointed to:
- Tina Peters
- Michael Flynn
- Jim Troupis
- imaginary parents who spoke at school board meetings

The list proves the opposite of the GOP’s intended point.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-05-27T19:45:59.263Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/republicans-slush-fund-payouts

The White House and its allies have repeatedly insisted that there are a great many legitimate “victims” of Biden-era “weaponization” abuses, but this is quickly followed by an obvious challenge: “Name one.”

The good news is, a variety of Republicans have tried to respond to that challenge by pointing to actual people they see as worthy of taxpayer-financed payouts. The bad news is, their list is embarrassingly unpersuasive.

Tina Peters: As part of an exchange on the controversial fund, Vice President JD Vance told the White House press corps last week that the infamous Colorado election denier is entitled to “some compensation for the fact that she was treated unfairly.”

This didn’t make any sense, in part because Peters was convicted of state crimes — the Biden administration had literally nothing to do with the case — and in part because the vice president said she was “innocent” despite the inconvenient fact that a Republican prosecutor convinced a jury of Peters’ peers that she was guilty of several felonies.

Michael Flynn: Republican Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida appeared on CNN last week and pointed specifically to the former White House national security adviser as a great example of someone who was “persecuted.” Donalds apparently didn’t think this one through.

For one thing, Flynn was prosecuted by the Trump administration, not the Biden administration. For another, Flynn, a former foreign agent, twice pleaded guilty to felonies in open court. And in case that weren’t quite enough, let’s not overlook the fact that Trump’s Justice Department had already agreed to give Flynn taxpayer money, despite his scandalous misdeeds. Why Donalds thinks he’s entitled to even more of our money is unclear.

Jim Troupis: Republican Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin this week told Fox Business that he’s “completely supportive” of the White House’s scandalous gambit, adding, “There have been hundreds of people harmed by Biden weaponization, including Judge Troupis.”

This is also a weak pitch. Troupis, a former Dane County judge, represented Trump in Wisconsin during the 2020 election and, according to prosecutors, was directly involved in the “fake elector” scheme that generated several criminal indictments. Troupis has denied wrongdoing, but he’s currently facing state charges that, like Peters’, are wholly unrelated to the Biden administration.....

Reality is stubborn: The Biden administration never “weaponized” the levers of federal power. Republicans don’t want to hear that, but they’ve searched far and wide to find evidence to bolster their conspiracy theory. They have come up empty because there is no evidence to uncover.

The more the party tries and fails to find a legitimate victim worthy of our money, the more it proves the opposite of the GOP’s intended point.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MaddowBlog-Republicans ke...