General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaddowBlog-Republicans keep trying (and failing) to find people worthy of 'slush fund' payouts
The more the party struggles to identify legitimate victims worthy of our money, the more it proves the opposite of the GOPs intended point.
Who should get payouts from Trumpâs slush fund? Republicans have specifically pointed to:
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-05-27T19:45:59.263Z
- Tina Peters
- Michael Flynn
- Jim Troupis
- imaginary parents who spoke at school board meetings
The list proves the opposite of the GOPâs intended point.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/republicans-slush-fund-payouts
The good news is, a variety of Republicans have tried to respond to that challenge by pointing to actual people they see as worthy of taxpayer-financed payouts. The bad news is, their list is embarrassingly unpersuasive.
Tina Peters: As part of an exchange on the controversial fund, Vice President JD Vance told the White House press corps last week that the infamous Colorado election denier is entitled to some compensation for the fact that she was treated unfairly.
This didnt make any sense, in part because Peters was convicted of state crimes the Biden administration had literally nothing to do with the case and in part because the vice president said she was innocent despite the inconvenient fact that a Republican prosecutor convinced a jury of Peters peers that she was guilty of several felonies.
Michael Flynn: Republican Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida appeared on CNN last week and pointed specifically to the former White House national security adviser as a great example of someone who was persecuted. Donalds apparently didnt think this one through.
For one thing, Flynn was prosecuted by the Trump administration, not the Biden administration. For another, Flynn, a former foreign agent, twice pleaded guilty to felonies in open court. And in case that werent quite enough, lets not overlook the fact that Trumps Justice Department had already agreed to give Flynn taxpayer money, despite his scandalous misdeeds. Why Donalds thinks hes entitled to even more of our money is unclear.
Jim Troupis: Republican Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin this week told Fox Business that hes completely supportive of the White Houses scandalous gambit, adding, There have been hundreds of people harmed by Biden weaponization, including Judge Troupis.
This is also a weak pitch. Troupis, a former Dane County judge, represented Trump in Wisconsin during the 2020 election and, according to prosecutors, was directly involved in the fake elector scheme that generated several criminal indictments. Troupis has denied wrongdoing, but hes currently facing state charges that, like Peters, are wholly unrelated to the Biden administration.....
Reality is stubborn: The Biden administration never weaponized the levers of federal power. Republicans dont want to hear that, but theyve searched far and wide to find evidence to bolster their conspiracy theory. They have come up empty because there is no evidence to uncover.
The more the party tries and fails to find a legitimate victim worthy of our money, the more it proves the opposite of the GOPs intended point.
lame54
(40,223 posts)SWBTATTReg
(26,466 posts)something, and all of them are crooks. I'm surprised that some democrats, faking being republicans, haven't applied to the fund yet.
I think the fund will be ruled invalid (per the Judge wondering how this fund was set up legally), like I've never heard of the IRS paying off someone when a tax return was revealed (and it shouldn't have been). In that case, it doesn't matter, you still owe any tax, etc. payable to the IRS.