General Discussion

flvegan

(65,887 posts)

7. Context. Sounds more like he walked back a general statement he made about ICE.

Fri Jan 16, 2026, 11:17 AM

Jan 16

More agreeing that not ALL of ICE is state sponsored terrorism, and that it would be better to simply work with them normally, status quo. What he didn't seem to walk back is that nazi fucks kicking in doors and shooting folks in the face was in fact state sponsored terrorism.

Folks that get their "news" from Yahoo/Mediaite probably just, you know, shouldn't. (see, that's a generalized statement, which I'd gladly stipulate that there are times that Yahoo/Mediaite may very well have a decent bit of "news" reported on their site, but doesn't walk back the context of the statement, as an example) Not sure Charlie Nash is putting things necessarily in a proper perspective from time to time.

That said, I didn't watch the video, just read the article. Maybe he does walk it all back and don a klan hood like some would suggest actually happened. And if I'm wrong, I'm wrong.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Scrivener7 PragmaticLiberal Woodwizard Bluesaph femmedem ProfessorGAC MorbidButterflyTat

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gavin Newsom concedes to Ben Sharpio [View all] angrychair Jan 16 OP

And that is when he lost america sboatcar Jan 16 #1

Looks like somebody is on an anti-Newsom tear Prairie Gates Jan 16 #2

All due respect it's not "anti-newson" angrychair Jan 16 #4

Quoting what he said on his own podcast is an anti-Newsom tear? EdmondDantes_ Jan 16 #13

Yeah, and it's Newsom Hassin Bin Sober Jan 16 #21

I think despite the protests we have a number of folks who prefer the Schumer approach. BannonsLiver Jan 16 #29

Absolutely. MorbidButterflyTat Jan 16 #39

maybe he got an offer justaprogressive Jan 16 #3

Imagine handing it to Ben Shapiro, the guy confused by WAP. WhiskeyGrinder Jan 16 #5

Exactly angrychair Jan 16 #6

Context. Sounds more like he walked back a general statement he made about ICE. flvegan Jan 16 #7

Context? Who needs context? MorbidButterflyTat Jan 16 #40

What a guy, a man of the people, amirite? Fiendish Thingy Jan 16 #8

Yea angrychair Jan 16 #10

So does this mean you won't be voting for him in the Canadian primary? BannonsLiver Jan 16 #30

From what I have seen Timewas Jan 16 #9

Nothing against Kelly angrychair Jan 16 #11

Kelly is anti-union. WhiteTara Jan 16 #16

Yea, that is what I thought angrychair Jan 16 #19

me too. WhiteTara Jan 16 #20

Only the beginning Timewas Jan 16 #26

??? Jilly_in_VA Jan 16 #31

Another contrived nothingburger. The sanctuary cities are under Nixie Jan 16 #12

It's not just what he said angrychair Jan 16 #15

+1 leftstreet Jan 16 #23

Still very contrived so-called criticism. Nixie Jan 16 #36

New division, I guess Torchlight Jan 16 #25

I've seen enough of Gavin kwolf68 Jan 16 #14

Yeah look at what they're doing to Minnesota. Initech Jan 16 #18

BOOOOOOOOOO!!! Initech Jan 16 #17

This kind of shit does not help our side !!! SamKnause Jan 16 #22

Newsom is not "the one" and I doubt he'll be the 2028 nominee Arazi Jan 16 #24

Defunding ICE is not negotiable JCMach1 Jan 16 #27

I'm not convinced angrychair Jan 16 #28

Just heard an excerpt from this on msnow yorkster Jan 16 #32

Shapiro says saying "Abolish Ice" is too extreme on MSNOW tirebiter Jan 16 #33

Which Shapiro? angrychair Jan 16 #34

you gotta check that typo quick because...it looks really bad fyi WhiskeyGrinder Jan 16 #35

The dude loves to try to triangulate. LudwigPastorius Jan 16 #37

Completely misrepresenting what he said Boo1 Jan 16 #38

Ok angrychair Jan 16 #43

Did you write the article? Boo1 Jan 16 #45

Here is the video. Conversation starts at 22:06 chowder66 Jan 16 #41

Thank you for posting that angrychair Jan 16 #42

Jumping to the center DiverDave Jan 16 #44