Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]UTUSN
(77,043 posts)38. Who rants, scolds, & self-regards more than Jon STEWART, with his Third Way/No Labels stuff?
And as for "tuning out rants ... no enlightenment/conversion... "" _ uh, Dear Leader's voters must be the exceptions, don't seem to mind coming from Dear Leader?
Yes, there has been a debate forever between Art being either "art for art's sake" (pure comedy/painting/music) vs "art as programatic" (agenda, message, mission).
I find KIMMEL/COLBERT to be every enjoyable, happy, and both funny/serious. Conan is fun mostly, yes childishly silly/creative.
And I agree with you about BEE and others of her characteristics no matter how much they are on our side, trudging along the laundry list of points that we already know and agree with - self-conscious, taking themselves seriously, predictable.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I like him lots, but he's always been more of the supposedly "neutral" no-politics type, more than LENO even.
UTUSN
Jan 7
#3
A struggle on principle has uncountable fronts, from small to large. They all have their place and whatever power.
UTUSN
Jan 7
#12
KIMMEL/COLBERT's routines are intricate, far from "lazy" - besides being exquisite commentary.
UTUSN
Jan 7
#9
As I've said, with "gentle" bits, minor political content of his whole thing, and not more jokes on KRASNOV
UTUSN
Jan 7
#29
You are determined to miss *my* thoughts - about my liking him, being in our sphere, disappointment *for now*.
UTUSN
Jan 7
#31
Nah. You missed it or are being overly sensitive about what he said. Maybe both.
BannonsLiver
Jan 7
#16
I focus more on targeting the political enemies out there instead of devaluing allies.
UTUSN
Jan 7
#28
Was hoping to let this go sinking away, but allow me to translate back to you what Conan's point and is not.
UTUSN
Jan 7
#47
KIMMEL/COLBERT aren't elevating him to a joke. They are eviscerating him far more than "serious" pundits.
UTUSN
Jan 7
#23
I do a fair amount of watching his podcast, more as a break from politics. Yes, he does "gentle" bits
UTUSN
Jan 7
#26
I actually put some effort in trying to be clear, contextual, and detailed in my less erratic posts.
UTUSN
Jan 7
#27
It's not about my tolerance for "disagreeing with (my) opinions. Your acknowledgment of my clarity
UTUSN
Jan 7
#48
KIMMEL/COLBERT zoom to mind, no? - Both do the ridiculing and serious parts with deadly effect.
UTUSN
Jan 7
#35