Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(129,207 posts)
2. The precedent was established in the Noriega case.
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 10:23 AM
Jan 5

Manuel Noriega was arrested in Panama and taken to the US for trial, and in that case the court did not address the question of whether the invasion that led to his capture was lawful, apparently considering that issue as irrelevant to the criminal case before it, and possibly beyond the scope of the court's authority to decide. Since Noriega was in custody following a valid indictment, the court didn't consider the legality of how he ended up there in the first place. That analysis, or the lack of it, may be constitutionally shaky but it's likely that the prosecution of Maduro will follow the same path.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How does a Federal Court ...»Reply #2