General Discussion

Mr.WeRP

(1,098 posts)

20. Yeah I read that and it is based solely on statements by DoJ leadership

Reply to Scrivener7 (Reply #14)

Tue Dec 23, 2025, 06:37 PM

23 hrs ago

No professional forensic analysis

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

kcoates

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wow please fact check your posts [View all] snowybirdie Yesterday OP

Why would you doubt that letter? Birds of a feather flock together- like Epstein reaching out to nasser Blues Heron Yesterday #1

NBC fact Checked snowybirdie 23 hrs ago #16

Hardly the gold standard there lol Blues Heron 23 hrs ago #17

Why did the DOJ release the fake Nassar letter malaise Yesterday #2

This is their plan. The heavily redacted batch didn't fly. So then they released that second batch. Scrivener7 Yesterday #3

Oh, that's really Machiavellian... ananda Yesterday #4

It's how they tried to hide Abu Ghraib. It toppled Dan Rather then, but ultimately didn't work. Scrivener7 Yesterday #6

Exactly. yellow dahlia Yesterday #8

Post removed Post removed 23 hrs ago #13

Again, see the Forbes article. It lists the elements in the letter that show it to be false. Scrivener7 23 hrs ago #15

Yeah I read it and the "analysis" is laughable Mr.WeRP 23 hrs ago #18

Have a lovely holiday. Scrivener7 23 hrs ago #19

... demmiblue 22 hrs ago #28

Oh, NOW I get this! It wasn't me, I swear. Scrivener7 22 hrs ago #31

Lol! I stand corrected... he has no more. demmiblue 22 hrs ago #35

They are trying to create confusion, so that nothing can be credible. yellow dahlia Yesterday #5

That set of my spidy sense as well. yourout Yesterday #7

Red Herring? 2naSalit Yesterday #9

It's in the files Kaleva 23 hrs ago #10

Because it purports to be canetoad 22 hrs ago #32

"Flood the zone with bullshit" - Steve Bannon This way, no one will be sure what is true and what is not true. Midnight Writer 22 hrs ago #36

OK, at what time are you saying that DUers were the problem, rather than the media who reported it? muriel_volestrangler 23 hrs ago #11

I find it odd that you are dismissing released evidence by the DoJ Mr.WeRP 23 hrs ago #12

Here's a Forbes article listing the elements in the letter that indicate it is false. Scrivener7 23 hrs ago #14

Yeah I read that and it is based solely on statements by DoJ leadership Mr.WeRP 23 hrs ago #20

I have read the forbes article a couple of times now questionseverything 23 hrs ago #23

I agree. We just can't know. And that's a big problem. Scrivener7 23 hrs ago #25

One can't prove a negative Kaleva 23 hrs ago #24

Of course you can prove a negative, if you have proof that is. Why would they choose to implicate trump Blues Heron 22 hrs ago #30

Where's your proof that the Nassar letter was fake? Wiz Imp 23 hrs ago #21

As more information comes out (like the reasons why the Epstein letter to Nasser mentioning Trump screams "fake" hlthe2b 23 hrs ago #22

Believe Bondi? It's in there not added. Blue Full Moon 22 hrs ago #26

Heh, good luck with that! n/t demmiblue 22 hrs ago #27

Unclench, would ya? Iggo 22 hrs ago #29

Is it possible/probable that the files contain all leads ? Raven123 22 hrs ago #33

I think you're right. Scrivener7 22 hrs ago #37

don't waffle, just dance DoBW 22 hrs ago #34

As reported tonight snowybirdie 22 hrs ago #38

One of the way posts are fact checked is by posting information. Irish_Dem 22 hrs ago #39

I haven't found Duers to be any more reliable than any other group of people on social media in fact checking - Ms. Toad 21 hrs ago #40

We are not journalists, and have no way to solidly fact-check. usonian 20 hrs ago #41

There's a lot more going on here than meets the eye. Patton French 11 hrs ago #42

Has anyone checked with Nassar? He might shed some light, and he's still alive, allegorical oracle 8 hrs ago #43