General Discussion

Mr.WeRP

(1,098 posts)

18. Yeah I read it and the "analysis" is laughable

Reply to Scrivener7 (Reply #15)

Tue Dec 23, 2025, 06:36 PM

Tuesday

It is based on DoJ leadership opinion and nothing else.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

kcoates

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wow please fact check your posts [View all] snowybirdie Tuesday OP

Why would you doubt that letter? Birds of a feather flock together- like Epstein reaching out to nasser Blues Heron Tuesday #1

NBC fact Checked snowybirdie Tuesday #16

Hardly the gold standard there lol Blues Heron Tuesday #17

Why did the DOJ release the fake Nassar letter malaise Tuesday #2

This is their plan. The heavily redacted batch didn't fly. So then they released that second batch. Scrivener7 Tuesday #3

Oh, that's really Machiavellian... ananda Tuesday #4

It's how they tried to hide Abu Ghraib. It toppled Dan Rather then, but ultimately didn't work. Scrivener7 Tuesday #6

Exactly. yellow dahlia Tuesday #8

Post removed Post removed Tuesday #13

Again, see the Forbes article. It lists the elements in the letter that show it to be false. Scrivener7 Tuesday #15

Yeah I read it and the "analysis" is laughable Mr.WeRP Tuesday #18

Have a lovely holiday. Scrivener7 Tuesday #19

... demmiblue Tuesday #28

Oh, NOW I get this! It wasn't me, I swear. Scrivener7 Tuesday #31

Lol! I stand corrected... he has no more. demmiblue Tuesday #35

They are trying to create confusion, so that nothing can be credible. yellow dahlia Tuesday #5

That set of my spidy sense as well. yourout Tuesday #7

Red Herring? 2naSalit Tuesday #9

It's in the files Kaleva Tuesday #10

Because it purports to be canetoad Tuesday #32

"Flood the zone with bullshit" - Steve Bannon This way, no one will be sure what is true and what is not true. Midnight Writer Tuesday #36

OK, at what time are you saying that DUers were the problem, rather than the media who reported it? muriel_volestrangler Tuesday #11

I find it odd that you are dismissing released evidence by the DoJ Mr.WeRP Tuesday #12

Here's a Forbes article listing the elements in the letter that indicate it is false. Scrivener7 Tuesday #14

Yeah I read that and it is based solely on statements by DoJ leadership Mr.WeRP Tuesday #20

I have read the forbes article a couple of times now questionseverything Tuesday #23

I agree. We just can't know. And that's a big problem. Scrivener7 Tuesday #25

One can't prove a negative Kaleva Tuesday #24

Of course you can prove a negative, if you have proof that is. Why would they choose to implicate trump Blues Heron Tuesday #30

Where's your proof that the Nassar letter was fake? Wiz Imp Tuesday #21

As more information comes out (like the reasons why the Epstein letter to Nasser mentioning Trump screams "fake" hlthe2b Tuesday #22

Believe Bondi? It's in there not added. Blue Full Moon Tuesday #26

Heh, good luck with that! n/t demmiblue Tuesday #27

Unclench, would ya? Iggo Tuesday #29

Is it possible/probable that the files contain all leads ? Raven123 Tuesday #33

I think you're right. Scrivener7 Tuesday #37

don't waffle, just dance DoBW Tuesday #34

As reported tonight snowybirdie Tuesday #38

One of the way posts are fact checked is by posting information. Irish_Dem Tuesday #39

I haven't found Duers to be any more reliable than any other group of people on social media in fact checking - Ms. Toad Tuesday #40

We are not journalists, and have no way to solidly fact-check. usonian Tuesday #41

There's a lot more going on here than meets the eye. Patton French Yesterday #42

Has anyone checked with Nassar? He might shed some light, and he's still alive, allegorical oracle Yesterday #43