General Discussion

Scrivener7

(58,153 posts)

3. This is their plan. The heavily redacted batch didn't fly. So then they released that second batch.

Tue Dec 23, 2025, 05:43 PM

Tuesday

When they released it, it was accompanied by a statement that many of the statements included within it were proven false.

So they released this letter, waited for people to read it and believe it, then proved it false. And there does seem to be evidence to prove it is not from Epstein:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylerroush/2025/12/23/major-epstein-files-release-doj-says-letter-to-larry-nassar-mentioning-trump-is-fake/

If this happens a few times, people will stop believing anything in the files is true.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

10 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ananda yellow dahlia MadLinguist erronis Codifer malaise Mike Niendorff susanr516 Chemical Bill scipan

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wow please fact check your posts [View all] snowybirdie Tuesday OP

Why would you doubt that letter? Birds of a feather flock together- like Epstein reaching out to nasser Blues Heron Tuesday #1

NBC fact Checked snowybirdie Tuesday #16

Hardly the gold standard there lol Blues Heron Tuesday #17

Why did the DOJ release the fake Nassar letter malaise Tuesday #2

This is their plan. The heavily redacted batch didn't fly. So then they released that second batch. Scrivener7 Tuesday #3

Oh, that's really Machiavellian... ananda Tuesday #4

It's how they tried to hide Abu Ghraib. It toppled Dan Rather then, but ultimately didn't work. Scrivener7 Tuesday #6

Exactly. yellow dahlia Tuesday #8

Post removed Post removed Tuesday #13

Again, see the Forbes article. It lists the elements in the letter that show it to be false. Scrivener7 Tuesday #15

Yeah I read it and the "analysis" is laughable Mr.WeRP Tuesday #18

Have a lovely holiday. Scrivener7 Tuesday #19

... demmiblue Tuesday #28

Oh, NOW I get this! It wasn't me, I swear. Scrivener7 Tuesday #31

Lol! I stand corrected... he has no more. demmiblue Tuesday #35

They are trying to create confusion, so that nothing can be credible. yellow dahlia Tuesday #5

That set of my spidy sense as well. yourout Tuesday #7

Red Herring? 2naSalit Tuesday #9

It's in the files Kaleva Tuesday #10

Because it purports to be canetoad Tuesday #32

"Flood the zone with bullshit" - Steve Bannon This way, no one will be sure what is true and what is not true. Midnight Writer Tuesday #36

OK, at what time are you saying that DUers were the problem, rather than the media who reported it? muriel_volestrangler Tuesday #11

I find it odd that you are dismissing released evidence by the DoJ Mr.WeRP Tuesday #12

Here's a Forbes article listing the elements in the letter that indicate it is false. Scrivener7 Tuesday #14

Yeah I read that and it is based solely on statements by DoJ leadership Mr.WeRP Tuesday #20

I have read the forbes article a couple of times now questionseverything Tuesday #23

I agree. We just can't know. And that's a big problem. Scrivener7 Tuesday #25

One can't prove a negative Kaleva Tuesday #24

Of course you can prove a negative, if you have proof that is. Why would they choose to implicate trump Blues Heron Tuesday #30

Where's your proof that the Nassar letter was fake? Wiz Imp Tuesday #21

As more information comes out (like the reasons why the Epstein letter to Nasser mentioning Trump screams "fake" hlthe2b Tuesday #22

Believe Bondi? It's in there not added. Blue Full Moon Tuesday #26

Heh, good luck with that! n/t demmiblue Tuesday #27

Unclench, would ya? Iggo Tuesday #29

Is it possible/probable that the files contain all leads ? Raven123 Tuesday #33

I think you're right. Scrivener7 Tuesday #37

don't waffle, just dance DoBW Tuesday #34

As reported tonight snowybirdie Tuesday #38

One of the way posts are fact checked is by posting information. Irish_Dem Tuesday #39

I haven't found Duers to be any more reliable than any other group of people on social media in fact checking - Ms. Toad Tuesday #40

We are not journalists, and have no way to solidly fact-check. usonian Tuesday #41

There's a lot more going on here than meets the eye. Patton French 17 hrs ago #42

Has anyone checked with Nassar? He might shed some light, and he's still alive, allegorical oracle 15 hrs ago #43