Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

erronis

(22,688 posts)
21. But they've already controlled the US (and state) governments. Good luck with banning!
Sat Mar 29, 2025, 05:31 PM
Mar 2025

A few million here, a few there. Lobbyists as messengers. Deniability.

With so much wealth in so few hands it won't take long to see a corporate banner and renaming of the US Capitol.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I always wonder about these efforts by investors to find/locate and seize opportunities to buy out and invest in SWBTATTReg Mar 2025 #1
Residents assumed that their detailed signed contracts were legal documents that would be upheld Irish_Dem Mar 2025 #2
yes, they did. private equity swoops in with their lawyers and muck it up. Demovictory9 Mar 2025 #5
Corrupt billionaires own the country and judges. They do what they want. Irish_Dem Mar 2025 #9
"Legal documents?" GiqueCee Mar 2025 #16
We are in end stage capitalism, pillage and ruin of Americans. Irish_Dem Mar 2025 #19
Far too many people... GiqueCee Mar 2025 #24
Capitalism could be called the dictatorship of capital. nt Comrade Citizen Mar 2025 #31
they were guaranteed, in writing, to get 85% of their buy in back if they chose to move out. the contract was null when Demovictory9 Mar 2025 #3
Sounds like they favored churn, where someone was making money all of the time, from the buying/selling of SWBTATTReg Mar 2025 #6
When you run out of the money yoo True Blue American Mar 2025 #23
My neighbor hires local college kids to be around once a week or so Demovictory9 Mar 2025 #27
The regular residents and original owners didn't consider that could happen. haele Mar 2025 #7
A must watch. dalton99a Mar 2025 #4
Jaybird and Citrine require a severe lesson. byronius Mar 2025 #13
More like private equity's desire to rid themselves of something that is not profitable. OldBaldy1701E Mar 2025 #8
Kick em when they're up Nonnia Bisnez Mar 2025 #10
How is this not criminal? dickthegrouch Mar 2025 #11
Which is EXACTLY WHY . . . AverageOldGuy Mar 2025 #12
He can live a fancy life anywhere on that $7200 per month Demovictory9 Mar 2025 #15
Guessing that cognitive skills and families wanting to just "get this over" is a factor. erronis Mar 2025 #20
If you don't own it, you don't control it. snot Mar 2025 #14
+1. Private equity should be banned from healthcare, housing and essential services dalton99a Mar 2025 #17
But they've already controlled the US (and state) governments. Good luck with banning! erronis Mar 2025 #21
I would stop after the word banned EdmondDantes_ Mar 2025 #28
Private equity cares only about money, nothing else. sakabatou Mar 2025 #18
We need to create a "predatory" tax classification, and place all private equity firms dobleremolque Mar 2025 #22
Vulture capitalism. Like corporate for-profit prisons. Lotta money in both. And now take their SS. Evolve Dammit Mar 2025 #25
It's all about PROFITS, and not at all about morality. Common decency. We have allowed a few freakish people PatrickforB Mar 2025 #26
Increases of taxes and insurance are bad enough bucolic_frolic Mar 2025 #29
That picture looked exactly True Blue American Mar 2025 #30
"Greed is good" Dark n Stormy Knight Mar 2025 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The new risk for resident...»Reply #21