Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: did they break the law? [View all]

Ms. Toad

(38,313 posts)
12. Having Signal installed on government issued phones apparently is prohibited.
Thu Mar 27, 2025, 11:21 AM
Mar 2025
On February 18th, Katie Arrington was named the Deputy Chief Information Officer for Cybersecurity and Chief Information Security Officer at the Department of Defense by the Trump Administration. She had served in the previous Administration in a similar role.

According to my source inside the Pentagon, shortly after Arrington’s arrival at DoD she issued a waiver and authorized the various service CIO’s to deploy Signal on government devices.


https://fpwellman.substack.com/p/exclusive-dod-has-deployed-signal

Apparently this came as a result of some of them throwing tantrums at not being able to take their personal cell phones (presumably with Signal) into SCIFs. The compromise was that they would leave their personal cell phones outside as long as they had Signal installed on their government phones.

This came in the same time frame as the same entity was issuing a warning about Signal vulnerabilities - including directing that Signal is NOT approved for processing or storing nonpublic unclassified information, and that all uses of Signal must abide by DoD and NSA/CSS policies.

So, while Signal isn't inherently evil, installing it on government phones is prohibited (absent a waiver). And while they weren't ordered to do top secret business on them - the app was installed on phones specifically so the phones could be taken into SCIFFs, where the person authorizing the waiver knew op secret information was being discussed/displayed - so that they could communicate via Signal with either with each other within the SCIF without leaving a trail - or with people outside the SCIF.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»did they break the law?»Reply #12