Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]LAS14
(15,451 posts)47. The flooding happened quickly, and then the water took a while to recede, but...
... hundreds/thousands(?) of rescue workers were not risking their lives trying, mostly vainly, to stop to fire from going on and on and on. WNC got lots of coverage, but California is not getting more than it deserves.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm in South, and we had plenty of coverage of NC floods. Still gettting notices. Admittedly, I'm sorry people in LA
Silent Type
Jan 2025
#1
wrong. flood coverage went on for weeks. fire affected middle class areas who just happen to have bloated
msongs
Jan 2025
#3
What bullshit. How can you do this while they are digging around for bodies and lives are ruined?
thebigidea
Jan 2025
#6
Agree that fire is more immediately devastating. (FYI) Flood damage is more insideous...
allegorical oracle
Jan 2025
#14
Am with you. Have been in fierce hurricanes (including Helene). Know how horrible and how
allegorical oracle
Jan 2025
#49
Just understand that many of us here in wnc got more than 750 from fema...
ExciteBike66
Jan 2025
#13