Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In my fucked up brain I still just can't buy that the election was legitimate. [View all]Farmer-Rick
(11,579 posts)151. Just read the original post
The post you keep replying to also lists probable causes for an investigation into the election.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
220 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In my fucked up brain I still just can't buy that the election was legitimate. [View all]
Botany
Wednesday
OP
It was an amateurish insurrection that failed miserably (while damaging lives and the People's property). . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#42
Elon Musk apparently got caught rigging the German election next month for the ATF Nazis to win.
Meadowoak
Wednesday
#81
Wow, I missed that piece of information! I hope they have evidence of the method used.
liberalla
Wednesday
#93
This is interesting. Do you have links so we can assess credibility of what Macron might have exactly said?
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#95
Thanks, that is what I thought it was. Interference is not "rigging", which the earlier poster used
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#192
Yep. Interference is what Russia did in the 2016 US elections (and the 2 elections since)
Wiz Imp
Thursday
#195
Sorry but that is BS - he didn't rig an election that hasnt even happened yet
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#173
Maybe it's time to consider the fact that we are a country full of morons, racists, and selfish pricks?
dem4decades
Wednesday
#4
Even though Rep. Balderson whose district the plant is in no doubt voted against the Chips Act ..
Botany
Wednesday
#30
"Doubting" is an appropriate stance at this time. I am slightly vaguely doubtful myself
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#46
Where were Ivanka's voting machines deployed? Why did Muak all but guarantee victory in the swing states?
live love laugh
Wednesday
#13
And wasn't Musk's Star Link in contact to the central tabulators in all the swing states?
Botany
Wednesday
#17
I have read that voting personnel praised Star link for increasing connectivity
Botany
Wednesday
#49
The flaws that were shown required the machines to be connected. Here's a StarLink story:
Callie1979
Wednesday
#80
"And how many racist, sexist, and mouth breathing dumb fucks does this country really have?"
Ray Bruns
Wednesday
#20
IMHO the stolen/blackmail top securtiy secrets documents won/gave him another term. nt
bonniebgood
Wednesday
#162
Post the plentiful evidence, w sources. Show it. You can't show evidence fr credible sources, I'm sure. .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#71
YOU said it was plentiful. Post the plentiful evidence you claim to have seen. Democrats have integrity
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#74
No. The standard refers to the evidence because the evidence has to come first
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#135
I read it all. You can't make sense of what I wrote because you make accusations and speculations on no evidence. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#142
Facts (evidence) first, then Probable Cause, then more facts, then charges.
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#141
No, and there you go again with the CHEAP tactic of trying to tell me what I am thinking. . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#146
I read the whole of your post more than twice. Probable cause is a conclusion from evidence, not the other way around
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#144
There is no evidence to conclude probable cause. You have presented none because you have none. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#148
The original post presents NO evidence, names, or sources. I called the poster out on it too in post #37. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#152
It would be nice if the poster gave even circumstantial evidence, but not even that. They gave nothing
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#193
What do you think is "auditing the results" and how are you sure that was not done?
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#137
You made the allegation: Ball is in your court. But you have no evidence, no names, no sources. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#155
Occam's razor says this is easier to do, doesn't risk prison time & doesn't require huge coverup/concealment. .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#97
Probably because they only had speculation and no credible evidence
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#38
How many provisionals? counted provisionals, uncounted provisionals, scared by reports of violence, ...
Festivito
Wednesday
#33
If you don't have real evidence, then this kind of speculation doesn't serve you well
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#37
I have done election work for 20 years and something about the election doesn't pass my smell test
Botany
Wednesday
#43
Sure. But sometimes some things stink without being rotten. All the same continue to be alert
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#50
What's fucked up is that you think your brain is fucked up to thinks these things.
Clouds Passing
Wednesday
#61
No conspiracy. Just morons, idiots, racists, white nationalist neo-nazis, dominionists, and misogynists.
Oopsie Daisy
Wednesday
#62
So we know the Chinese have been hacking the government since at least October right?
questionseverything
Thursday
#209
Never under estimate the STUPIDITY of the "joe rogan" American public. Add to that the racism, sexism, and bigotry that
JohnSJ
Wednesday
#72
The polls continually had it as a close race, even when Biden was our nominee.
Omnipresent
Wednesday
#79
You do realize that the bullet ballot theory was immediately disproven right?
EdmondDantes_
Wednesday
#89
It's not a stretch to distrust a proven liar and a cheat and a Russian Asset...
suegeo
Wednesday
#99
I have seen stories that Musk and Vlad have interfered with other elections in the past.
Botany
Wednesday
#111
If any of this is true, this logic demands that Biden and Harris are complicit in the "theft"
tritsofme
Wednesday
#113
Magic isn't pulling a rabbit out of a hat - it's manipulating perceptions.
alittlelark
Wednesday
#118
And in contesting the 2020 election "they" got a hold of the voting machines and tabulators hardware and software.
Botany
Wednesday
#125
Republicans ALWAYS throw up a smoke screen to accuse other people of doing what they themselves are actually doing.
hadEnuf
Wednesday
#168
We the People will never know the extent of AI and propaganda from other countries that soaked into millions of voters
Evolve Dammit
Wednesday
#132
I hate indulging in such conspiracy theories, but in the back of my mind I just...
the nelm
Wednesday
#140
If trump just won in every swing state and every other state stayed that same
DetroitLegalBeagle
Wednesday
#158
I suggest Iowa maga are more gaslightable than Mass maga; more susceptible to fears about Deep State. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#160
The hardest thing for me to understand is the lower turnout of Democratic voters.
3catwoman3
Wednesday
#171
Nothing wrong w your brain that I can see, Botany. I have the same questions & more.
Hekate
Thursday
#190
Me either. Those bullet ballots probably came from the same print shop as the fake elector documents.
Vinca
Thursday
#199
Could someone PLEASE give more info: "What was Musk doing compiling a d-base list of votes that could be brought in..."
._.
Thursday
#200
As near as I can tell and or guess Musk bought (not registered? I'll give you $100 to register. Musk) ....
Botany
Thursday
#204
Watch how fast that "they" push the total scam that is Crypto now. The Crypto boys were in on the steal.
Botany
Thursday
#215
If you make politics your religion, your brain will have difficulty processing contrary information
Jose Garcia
Thursday
#202
You don't think that the election was legitimate because you don't want to believe that Trump
totodeinhere
Thursday
#205