Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In my fucked up brain I still just can't buy that the election was legitimate. [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(51,713 posts)38. Probably because they only had speculation and no credible evidence
I don't know, but since I don't think there is credible evidence my best guess is that "the Dem leadership" don't have credible evidence either.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
220 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In my fucked up brain I still just can't buy that the election was legitimate. [View all]
Botany
Wednesday
OP
It was an amateurish insurrection that failed miserably (while damaging lives and the People's property). . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#42
Elon Musk apparently got caught rigging the German election next month for the ATF Nazis to win.
Meadowoak
Wednesday
#81
Wow, I missed that piece of information! I hope they have evidence of the method used.
liberalla
Wednesday
#93
This is interesting. Do you have links so we can assess credibility of what Macron might have exactly said?
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#95
Thanks, that is what I thought it was. Interference is not "rigging", which the earlier poster used
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#192
Yep. Interference is what Russia did in the 2016 US elections (and the 2 elections since)
Wiz Imp
Thursday
#195
Sorry but that is BS - he didn't rig an election that hasnt even happened yet
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#173
Maybe it's time to consider the fact that we are a country full of morons, racists, and selfish pricks?
dem4decades
Wednesday
#4
Even though Rep. Balderson whose district the plant is in no doubt voted against the Chips Act ..
Botany
Wednesday
#30
"Doubting" is an appropriate stance at this time. I am slightly vaguely doubtful myself
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#46
Where were Ivanka's voting machines deployed? Why did Muak all but guarantee victory in the swing states?
live love laugh
Wednesday
#13
And wasn't Musk's Star Link in contact to the central tabulators in all the swing states?
Botany
Wednesday
#17
I have read that voting personnel praised Star link for increasing connectivity
Botany
Wednesday
#49
The flaws that were shown required the machines to be connected. Here's a StarLink story:
Callie1979
Wednesday
#80
"And how many racist, sexist, and mouth breathing dumb fucks does this country really have?"
Ray Bruns
Wednesday
#20
IMHO the stolen/blackmail top securtiy secrets documents won/gave him another term. nt
bonniebgood
Wednesday
#162
Post the plentiful evidence, w sources. Show it. You can't show evidence fr credible sources, I'm sure. .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#71
YOU said it was plentiful. Post the plentiful evidence you claim to have seen. Democrats have integrity
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#74
No. The standard refers to the evidence because the evidence has to come first
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#135
I read it all. You can't make sense of what I wrote because you make accusations and speculations on no evidence. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#142
Facts (evidence) first, then Probable Cause, then more facts, then charges.
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#141
No, and there you go again with the CHEAP tactic of trying to tell me what I am thinking. . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#146
I read the whole of your post more than twice. Probable cause is a conclusion from evidence, not the other way around
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#144
There is no evidence to conclude probable cause. You have presented none because you have none. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#148
The original post presents NO evidence, names, or sources. I called the poster out on it too in post #37. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#152
It would be nice if the poster gave even circumstantial evidence, but not even that. They gave nothing
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#193
What do you think is "auditing the results" and how are you sure that was not done?
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#137
You made the allegation: Ball is in your court. But you have no evidence, no names, no sources. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#155
Occam's razor says this is easier to do, doesn't risk prison time & doesn't require huge coverup/concealment. .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#97
Probably because they only had speculation and no credible evidence
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#38
How many provisionals? counted provisionals, uncounted provisionals, scared by reports of violence, ...
Festivito
Wednesday
#33
If you don't have real evidence, then this kind of speculation doesn't serve you well
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#37
I have done election work for 20 years and something about the election doesn't pass my smell test
Botany
Wednesday
#43
Sure. But sometimes some things stink without being rotten. All the same continue to be alert
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#50
What's fucked up is that you think your brain is fucked up to thinks these things.
Clouds Passing
Wednesday
#61
No conspiracy. Just morons, idiots, racists, white nationalist neo-nazis, dominionists, and misogynists.
Oopsie Daisy
Wednesday
#62
So we know the Chinese have been hacking the government since at least October right?
questionseverything
Thursday
#209
Never under estimate the STUPIDITY of the "joe rogan" American public. Add to that the racism, sexism, and bigotry that
JohnSJ
Wednesday
#72
The polls continually had it as a close race, even when Biden was our nominee.
Omnipresent
Wednesday
#79
You do realize that the bullet ballot theory was immediately disproven right?
EdmondDantes_
Wednesday
#89
It's not a stretch to distrust a proven liar and a cheat and a Russian Asset...
suegeo
Wednesday
#99
I have seen stories that Musk and Vlad have interfered with other elections in the past.
Botany
Wednesday
#111
If any of this is true, this logic demands that Biden and Harris are complicit in the "theft"
tritsofme
Wednesday
#113
Magic isn't pulling a rabbit out of a hat - it's manipulating perceptions.
alittlelark
Wednesday
#118
And in contesting the 2020 election "they" got a hold of the voting machines and tabulators hardware and software.
Botany
Wednesday
#125
Republicans ALWAYS throw up a smoke screen to accuse other people of doing what they themselves are actually doing.
hadEnuf
Wednesday
#168
We the People will never know the extent of AI and propaganda from other countries that soaked into millions of voters
Evolve Dammit
Wednesday
#132
I hate indulging in such conspiracy theories, but in the back of my mind I just...
the nelm
Wednesday
#140
If trump just won in every swing state and every other state stayed that same
DetroitLegalBeagle
Wednesday
#158
I suggest Iowa maga are more gaslightable than Mass maga; more susceptible to fears about Deep State. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Wednesday
#160
The hardest thing for me to understand is the lower turnout of Democratic voters.
3catwoman3
Wednesday
#171
Nothing wrong w your brain that I can see, Botany. I have the same questions & more.
Hekate
Thursday
#190
Me either. Those bullet ballots probably came from the same print shop as the fake elector documents.
Vinca
Thursday
#199
Could someone PLEASE give more info: "What was Musk doing compiling a d-base list of votes that could be brought in..."
._.
Thursday
#200
As near as I can tell and or guess Musk bought (not registered? I'll give you $100 to register. Musk) ....
Botany
Thursday
#204
Watch how fast that "they" push the total scam that is Crypto now. The Crypto boys were in on the steal.
Botany
Thursday
#215
If you make politics your religion, your brain will have difficulty processing contrary information
Jose Garcia
Thursday
#202
You don't think that the election was legitimate because you don't want to believe that Trump
totodeinhere
Thursday
#205