Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hekate

(95,569 posts)
20. Jesus, people. Maybe give it a rest for one or two freaking days? You are all going to miss Biden when he's gone
Tue Dec 24, 2024, 10:21 PM
Dec 24

We’re going to miss him like hell.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Biden must have been OK with Garland because he could have replaced him at anytime, or told him to crank it up. Silent Type Dec 24 #1
But you know that's not true Orrex Dec 24 #11
"a mistake that Biden openly acknowledged" Polybius Dec 24 #12
"Mistake" was the wrong word for me to use there Orrex Dec 24 #15
Ahh yes, I remember him saying something like that Polybius Dec 24 #17
God forbid we wouldn't want to be attacked 24/7 by right wing propaganda and every Republican in government Hassin Bin Sober Dec 24 #22
You've clearly got it all figured out, so paint us a picture. Orrex Dec 24 #23
they might even call us commies and terrorists and perophiles who murder children rampartd Dec 25 #33
Absolutely Cthulu on call Dec 25 #37
Sure Cirsium Dec 25 #29
While not dissing Garland, I believe we would've been better served by a more aggressive AG. n/t Dennis Donovan Dec 24 #2
Agree republianmushroom Dec 24 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author dalton99a Dec 24 #4
lol what silly nonsense. tritsofme Dec 24 #5
Or not running for the Dem Nomination in 2016 maxsolomon Dec 24 #6
Only one sitting VP was directly elected President in 150 years, and that was George HW Bush Polybius Dec 24 #13
Even so it still might have been a worse decision than Garland as AG. RockRaven Dec 25 #26
Think Obama and Clinton had an agreement RhapsodyFav Dec 25 #28
No. Running for reelection was Jose Garcia Dec 24 #7
The worst was not running in 2016. He would have likely defeated Clinton, then Trump. Celerity Dec 24 #8
Maybe Polybius Dec 24 #14
Biden had far less perceived baggage than Clinton, and the misogyny factor would have went poof. Celerity Dec 24 #16
I'm not saying Biden would have lost, I just don't know Polybius Dec 24 #19
Not a chance Biden could have defeated Clinton in the 2016 primaries, IMO. Just like in 2008, she had about half the Midwestern Democrat Dec 25 #36
Only once in the last 70 years has the same party won three elections in a row MichMan Dec 25 #31
well, Clinton was not the answer, and now here we all sit Celerity Dec 25 #35
Check DU around the time Biden was elected. Pretty sure the sense at DU RandomNumbers Dec 24 #9
a 'maga' that prosecuted over 1200 maga rioters bigtree Dec 24 #10
Thank you yet again Hekate Dec 24 #21
Even without Garland Blue_Tires Dec 24 #18
Jesus, people. Maybe give it a rest for one or two freaking days? You are all going to miss Biden when he's gone Hekate Dec 24 #20
Never, Garland deserves all the hate Sewa Dec 25 #24
Merry freaking Christmas to you, too. Felicitations of the season. Hekate Dec 25 #25
Can't argue with that, he was recommended to Obama for SCOTUS by a Republican. nt doc03 Dec 25 #27
My view remains qazplm135 Dec 25 #30
Garland is a wrecking ball. Bluethroughu Dec 25 #32
Running for re-election was the worst decision Biden ever made In It to Win It Dec 25 #34
At this point fuck optics Cthulu on call Dec 25 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Garland the worst descion...»Reply #20