Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Garland's Decisions For 2 Investigations [View all]Fiendish Thingy
(18,800 posts)59. Secret things behind the scenes?
What are you talking about?
The investigation, indictment and prosecution of Trump by DOJ is part of the public record, and refutes the claim by you and others that DOJ did nothing.
Indeed, my original response to gab was to encourage him to let go of his burning, all consuming hatred for Garland, as a form of self care to better prepare for the challenges ahead. Of course, the choice is ultimately his to make. Despite the distressing outcome of Trumps court-enabled evasion of justice, I carry no such hatred, so there is nothing to let go of.
In the meantime, I will continue to defend reality and the facts that contribute to that reality.
(See quote in my sig line for more info)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Of course. They're doing secret things behind the scenes and it's not a Law & Order episode.
Scrivener7
20 hrs ago
#58
So it is only for the people who disagree with you. Somehow, that doesn't surprise me at all.
Scrivener7
20 hrs ago
#60
Are you talking about DOJ's non-public actions during the early part of the investigation?
Fiendish Thingy
20 hrs ago
#62
Walk me through how Garland, or any AG of your choosing, could have circumvented the courts' obstruction
Fiendish Thingy
19 hrs ago
#70
If you've been here since 2003, surely you've seen the pushback on gab's Garland bashing
Fiendish Thingy
Monday
#14
Fact. We are now on the road to a fascist dictatorship. Fact. The actual criminals now have full power and have
hadEnuf
22 hrs ago
#45
Sorry, Garland concentrated on putting away a few small fish while trying not to look "political" to the big fish.
hadEnuf
20 hrs ago
#61
Too bad you weren't around to advise the civil rights leaders when they called out injustices in the 50's and 60's.
58Sunliner
21 hrs ago
#49
If Biden felt it was such a mistake to pick Garland, why didn't he fire him a couple of years ago?
TheRickles
Monday
#17
Because it would have looked awful with a pending investigation against Hunter.
SunSeeker
Monday
#21
If you think about that question in terms of political reality, you'll have your answer
Orrex
19 hrs ago
#71
He could have urged Garland to retire in order to spend more time with him family.....
TheRickles
19 hrs ago
#73
I was a Garland supporter for the first year or two. What a major, total disappointment he is, even derelict.
MLAA
Monday
#29