General Discussion

Your statement still frames the argument as DOJ did nothing , and those of us defending reality know that is factually inaccurate, that DOJ did indeed do something (investigate and prosecute Trump) despite obstruction and delays from both career staff and the courts.

Then you double down and call those who point out this observable, measurable reality (DOJ did indeed investigate and prosecute Trump) “apologists”. The defense of reality requires no apologies.

If anyone is acting as an apologists, it is those who completely ignore (and apparently accept and forgive) the indisputable, critical role the courts, especially SCOTUS played in enabling Trump to evade justice. No matter who the AG was - Schiff, Kirschner, Weissman, Yates, you pick - the delays and obstruction by the courts and the ultimate outcome - no trial before the election - would have been the same.

I am fully expecting your reply to move the goalposts (“yes, Garland and DOJ “did something”, but it was slow, incompetent and not aggressive enough”, etc.) I can only have a discussion with you based on your actual words , which is why I have quoted you in my reply.

P.S. I don’t think I’ve ever insulted anyone personally- I have ridiculed the errors in their arguments and questioned their motivation for spreading provably false information, but did not insult or call them names. Believe it or not, we all wanted to see Trump behind bars.