General Discussion

That is your opinion drawn from the facts.

Incompetence would require proof of good intentions, but poor, unskilled execution, whereas fact based reality has shown while there was indeed intention to investigate and prosecute to the full extent of the law, with a team of experienced prosecutors on hand, the execution of the investigation was obstructed by career employees at DOJ and FBI, as well as by SCOTUS.

Complicity would require evidence of Garland’s intentions to assist Trump in evading justice, and in Garland directly obstructing the investigation and prosecution. There are no facts in evidence to support this conclusion (and no, Garland moderating panels at the Federalist Society nor the passage of time between the launching of the investigation in June 2021 and the indictments are not PROOF! of Garland’s complicity)