General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Garland's Decisions For 2 Investigations [View all]Fiendish Thingy
(18,800 posts)I dont defend Garland, I defend reality, by refuting your unsubstantiated opinions that you present as verified facts (yes, sometimes you include actual facts in your Garland bashing, but only as a path to insisting on a particular meaning gleaned from those facts).
Did Garland dismiss the Gaetz investigation, or was it the US Attorney in Florida?
Emptywheel appears to be focused on the challenges ahead, and the journalistic malpractice occurring on a daily basis. She has covered the Trump investigations exhaustively, and, aside from Smiths final report, Im not sure what else there is to discuss unless new information surfaces. There is no need for me to post past links from her site, as you never read them anyway, or if you did, your blinding hatred for Garland kept you from understanding the point she was making.
From my unscientific observation, it was only a handful of posters who challenged you on your false statements about Garland and the DOJ. Otherwise, your Garland-bashing threads often rose to the top of the rec list - seems that would give you quite a boost, rather than scars.
The fact is you seem driven to post Garland bashing OPs almost daily, scapegoating him for everything from Trump escaping justice (when folks in the reality based community know the real villain of this story is the Roberts court) to Harris losing the election, to the heartbreak of psoriasis.
My wish is for you to, as Princess Elsa sings in Frozen, Let It Go, and free yourself from the prison of Garland hatred and let your self-inflicted scars heal so you will be prepared for the challenges that lie ahead.
?feature=shared