Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cable News Clips

Rhiannon12866

(224,367 posts)

5. I know! I guess they figure it no longer matters if he's no longer under congressional jurisdiction

Reply to Zambero (Reply #3)

Thu Nov 14, 2024, 08:55 AM

Nov 14

But I'd think that any misconduct by a sitting member of Congress would be essential to get on the record. And I did read that the report could still be released if a majority of the House Ethics Committee agreed to - but that would require a yes vote from at least one of the 5 Republicans on the 10-member Committee.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Senate GOP 'sees no path' for Matt Gaetz's confirmation - Way Too Early - MSNBC [View all] Rhiannon12866 Nov 14 OP

And he already resigned... kerouac2 Nov 14 #1

I read that he resigned to prevent release of the report from the House Ethics Committee into his misconduct Rhiannon12866 Nov 14 #2

Wondering why that would preclude reelease of the report? Zambero Nov 14 #3

I know! I guess they figure it no longer matters if he's no longer under congressional jurisdiction Rhiannon12866 Nov 14 #5

So in other words, it would be a sanctioned coverup Zambero Nov 14 #6

But what retribution would the Republican members face from TFG?? Rhiannon12866 Nov 14 #7

Gaetz will be confirmed kansasobama Nov 14 #4