Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cannabis

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Eugene

(62,873 posts)
Sat Jan 20, 2024, 05:39 PM Jan 2024

Illinois Supreme Court to decide if police may search vehicles based on smell of marijuana or if it's an 'aroma of legal [View all]

Source: Chicago Tribune

Illinois Supreme Court to decide if police may search vehicles based on smell of marijuana or if it’s an ‘aroma of legality’

Robert McCoppin, Chicago Tribune
Fri, January 19, 2024 at 11:33 AM EST·5 min read

An issue that has tied lower courts in knots — whether the odor of cannabis alone is grounds for police to search a vehicle — is now before the Illinois Supreme Court.

Appellate courts have split over the question, forcing the high court to make the call. At issue are efforts to keep the roads safe and prevent illegal trafficking, while protecting a constitutional right against unreasonable searches.

Before legalization, courts had long held that the smell of marijuana was grounds for a search, defense attorney James Mertes conceded during arguments before the Supreme Court earlier this month. But Mertes argued that once possession of small amounts of recreational pot became legal under state law in 2020, smell no longer is per se evidence of a crime.

“The odor of cannabis is now an aroma of legality,” Mertes told the high court.

-snip-

Read more: https://news.yahoo.com/illinois-supreme-court-decide-police-163300690.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cannabis»Illinois Supreme Court to...»Reply #0