Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
5. Well, it isn't so much that there aren't local progressives in office
Sat Jun 27, 2015, 06:46 AM
Jun 2015

It's more that the Democratic party leadership makes damn sure they don't move up the chain.

You don't think Californians could, and WANT TO, challenge Feinstein? The party is absolutely against it, I heard (but have yet to see or read the background info) that some rule was passed here about not primarying Democatic incumbents.

In this state we actually do have a deep bench of progressives in local and state office who could fill that Senate seat with some real progressive values, and the people of this state deserve such a primary fight. It's the corporate capture of party leadership that prevents it. That may not be the case in every state or every situation, but it's definitely a big part of the problem.

I join you in your desire for more progressives in lower offices, I just don't think that's the main obstacle to getting them in higher offices.

edit to add: I rec'd this because it's a good discussion to have

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»TPP fight illustrates Lef...»Reply #5