Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
11. Hi Sabrina, just a quicky response on one point
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 02:43 PM
Apr 2015

I'm not a scholar on the subject. I appreciate being corrected on this matter, but I don't think the argument is that FDR 'only intended to save capitalism' per se, but my take reading what I have on FDR, is that he definitely was a Capitalist and yes, it was imperative in his eyes that the Capitalist System MUST be saved.

Despite the social and work programs he created seeming to be "socialistic" and yes it was, ONE important objective was to revive the capitalist state., that's always been my take.. for what it's worth.

In other words, it's not about "smearing" FDR from left, it's more about looking at it with a much broader scope of complexity. Does that make sense?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»The Democratic Party Dead...»Reply #11