Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
5. How about:
Wed Apr 15, 2015, 09:35 PM
Apr 2015
Completely publicly funded elections; no personal contributions whatsoever.
Or; Individual contributions cannot exceed $2000.00 per person per year. Contributors must pass a three part test 1) are you alive? 2) can you express yourself as an individual? 3) did you earn the money you plan to contribute?

No third party broadcasted political advertisements. All electronically distributed advertisements/information/talking points/propaganda must be linked to and only released by candidate approval.

Third party freedom of speech is protected by print media alone (includes billboards).

501(c)4s to be enforced as written , not with relaxed interpretation.

Money is not speech, thought, or opinion; it is property.

Live action/performance support of a party or candidate cannot be broadcast or recorded and sold.

Web political traffic must be "seek to find" only, no pop ups or deceptive redirection.



Could Ms. Clinton support such an amendment? Which points could she support? What would she change and why?
Anyway we could ask her? in public? here?





Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Hillary Clinton says she ...»Reply #5