Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: Soak the Rich? Or Get Our Wealth Back? [View all]1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)46. Well ...
You're making the case that a workable and
convincing plan needs to be created that frames
the issue for a particular audience.
convincing plan needs to be created that frames
the issue for a particular audience.
Yes, I am.
Who is the audience?
The public or the rich?
The public or the rich?
Both.
FRD and Eisenhower already did this.
We need to follow those examples, applying
the latest technologies.
We need to follow those examples, applying
the latest technologies.
Okay ... Now, how is that to be implemented today?
What is unconvincing about the WPA as a template?
Go out side and ask the first 10 people you see to tell you what the WPA is/did.
Or are you just being deliberately obtuse?
No ... I recognize the difference between a idea/fantasy and a workable plan.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Unfortuantely, tax monies usually only encourage the political elite to fund new wars.
truedelphi
Mar 2015
#22
So your rationale is to keep taxes on the wealthy low, 'cause government might misuse the money?
Scuba
Mar 2015
#31
"This was not growth." That's correct. It was legalized theft. Hard to tell where ...
Scuba
Mar 2015
#2
There is little difference between a campaign "donation", paying exhorbant fees for speeches or
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#5
We also need 1) a minimum guaranteed income. 2) Publicly funded health CARE for all. 3) Publicly
Vincardog
Mar 2015
#11
Do you see any hope that any of this will happen? It seems to me that the wealthy have already
Dark n Stormy Knight
Mar 2015
#13
They both amount to the same but the poor rich want sympathy so they are claiming
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#20
It's a matter of perspective. When the rich steal our wealth they call it good business.
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#23
Would it turn into another sell/trade credit program like carbon emissions? ~ nt
antiquie
Mar 2015
#27
He isn't talking about framing but selling old conservative snake oil to actually further
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#56