Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ilsa

(62,334 posts)
6. That would require DNA testing for paternity,
Sun Aug 2, 2015, 07:40 AM
Aug 2015

another expensive new cost to obtaining an abortion, along with lawyers for fighting those entanglements. No thanks.

And if the father declares he'll raise the baby and pay for her medical care even though she doesn't want to go through a pregnancy? No thank you.

Getting an abortion shouldn't require a woman to turn to legal proceedings and potentially have to wait months for the simple procedure, turning it into difficult one.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

KR 6chars Aug 2015 #1
K & R Kenjie Aug 2015 #2
k&r....n/t BlueCollar Aug 2015 #3
Takes two Scarsdale Aug 2015 #4
That would require DNA testing for paternity, Ilsa Aug 2015 #6
Ilsa pointed out just a couple of problems with your "solutions". Given time I'm sure we could.. Lochloosa Aug 2015 #11
Mmmm. Hatchling Aug 2015 #12
Read the post i was responding to. Lochloosa Aug 2015 #13
Yep retrowire Aug 2015 #5
Next Republican Goal: Women's Suffrage. Scuba Aug 2015 #7
I'm sick and tired of it, too. Kath1 Aug 2015 #8
It's good to get it out there in the open...again Hydra Aug 2015 #9
k & r. Thanks for posting. nm rhett o rick Aug 2015 #10
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Elizabeth Warren»Elizabeth Warren: I'm Si...»Reply #6